Search for: "Unknown Defendants DOES 1-20" Results 121 - 140 of 478
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2020, 5:21 am by Eugene Volokh
Does: In this action against unnamed and unknown defendants, John Does 1–11 …, Richard Roe … moves to proceed under a pseudonym or, in the alternative, to seal the case. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am by Phil Dixon
Where (as happened here) the State does not object, the Court of Appeals may exercise jurisdiction by granting the petitions for writ of certiorari. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 2:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  As of September 1, 2020, there were, according to my tally, a total of 20 COVID-19-Related securities class action lawsuit filings. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:26 am by Florence Campbell Jones
SFO annual Report 2019/20 The SFO Report[1] covers the 12 month period to 31 March 2020 and reflects a mixed year in terms of success for the agency. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 9:08 am by Phil Dixon
Double jeopardy only protects from subsequent criminal prosecution and does not prohibit other civil penalties. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Rachael Hanna
On July 20, the Ninth Circuit declined to rehear en banc Fazaga v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Each claimant is only liable for a several share of the common costs of pursuing the GLO and a several and equal share of any costs awarded to the defendant if the claim does not succeed. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 12:07 pm by Jon Sands
This contrasts with Doe v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Plaintiff stated claim for a free speech violation where Sheriff allegedly interfered with legal mail; defendants were not entitled to qualified immunity; (2) Qualified immunity applied to alleged Fourth Amendment violation; other claims were waived Haze v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 3:11 pm by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Plaintiff sued some unknown “John Doedefendants who infringed plaintiff’s copyrights. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am by John Elwood
Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics and under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
On 28 January 2020, Steyn J handed down the judgement in DXB v Persons Unknown [2020] EWHC 134 (QB), a claim brought pursuant to “the Venables jurisdiction” for an extension of the anonymity of a child defendant beyond his 18th birthday. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 6:42 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
All but one of the defendants failed to respond to the statement of claim, resulting in a deemed conclusion under Rule 19.02(1)(a) that the defendants admit the allegations against them. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong defended the bill when it passed, calling it a step in the right direction. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 3:00 am by Folkert Graafsma
 They admit that some AB findings on CVDs are “laudatory“, but simultaneously claim that others are “deeply flawed“.[20]  Fair enough. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 1:38 pm by Daphne Keller
TL;DR: Glawischnig-Piesczek does not discuss when a filtering order might be considered proportionate or consistent with fundamental rights under the EU Charter. [read post]