Search for: "Vega v. Texas"
Results 121 - 140
of 246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
(Docket Report) (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Acts of inducement may be inferred from defendant’s pre-issuance conduct: SynQor, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
Amazon.com Inc (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Patent case transferred to California, citing location of defendants and witnesses: Software Archives v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm
(Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Plaintiff’s failure to seek preliminary injunction sinks wilfulness claim as to post-filing conduct: WebMap Technologies LLC v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
of Texas at Austin 1.18 $106,598 $90,100 V&erbilt Univ. 1.19 $129,030 $108,800 Univ. of Arkansas 1.19 $61,500 $51,700 Mitchell Hamline Sch. of Law 1.21 $64,429 $53,200 Univ. of California-Los Angeles 1.26 $121,453 $96,600 Univ. of North Dakota 1.26 $61,500 $48,800 Univ. of Kansas 1.27 $66,415 $52,100 Univ. of Kentucky 1.28 $69,860 $54,400 Univ. of Mississippi 1.32 $64,300 $48,700 The Univ. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
(Ars Technica) US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court agrees to hear Bilski case: decision to have broad implications for Silicon Valley companies (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Summary judgment based on licensing defense: Accolade Systems v Citrix Systems (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Summary judgment of noninfringement granted: Fenner v Microsoft (EDTexweblog.com) USPTO initially… [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
(Ars Technica) US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court agrees to hear Bilski case: decision to have broad implications for Silicon Valley companies (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Summary judgment based on licensing defense: Accolade Systems v Citrix Systems (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Summary judgment of noninfringement granted: Fenner v Microsoft (EDTexweblog.com) USPTO initially… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
The Characteristics of the Most-Litigated Patents’ (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Saving US innovation: more patent funding needed (IP Watchdog) BPAI backlog (Patently-O) Deadline to volunteer for the USPTO peer review pilot program is approaching (Patentably Defined) Check out the new beta test release of the USPTO’s website (Patentably Defined) (Just an Examiner) Second pair of eyes fails innovation in the US (IP Watchdog) USPTO needs improved workflow management (IP… [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm
Parents of children with disabilities challenge Texas's order prohibiting mask mandates. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:28 am
: Everpure, LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:51 am
The criminal case is U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:03 am
Dee V Benson, US Dist. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Texas: JMOL rulings – damages experts, future royalties, JMOL standards, obviousness, etc: Soverain v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 10:46 pm
Horton v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm
Justice Samuel Alito is up next with Husted v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:30 am
Petronastowers.net (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas In re Holt, 310 B.R. 675, 679. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas In re Holt, 310 B.R. 675, 679. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 3:38 pm
Epic Advertising, Inc (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Morningware - Keyword advertising lawsuit survives motion to dismiss: Morningware v Hearthware (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) OpBiz – OpBiz, owner of Planet Hollywood Resort & Casino, gets temporary restraining order against domain name planet-hollywood-resort.com: OpBiz v Unister (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)… [read post]
