Search for: "Verizon Services, Corp."
Results 121 - 140
of 230
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2011, 12:49 pm
Ricoh Corp., 487 U.S. 22, 29 (1988). [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 11:41 am
Verizon Services Corp., et al., 6:09cv260. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 4:52 pm
Verizon Services Corp.), the Middle District of Florida found that: there was a joint relationship between a leasing agency and the entity it contracted with; the failure to keep time records, together with Plaintiff’s testimony that she did work overtime, required a denial of summary judgment; employers had constructive knowledge of overtime being worked; and the Fluctuating Work Week (FWW) method of compensation could not be used. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 6:49 am
Verizon Services Corp. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:36 pm
No. 337-TA-712) granting Complainants Verizon Communications Inc. and Verizon Services Corp. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:37 pm
In Order No. 30, ALJ Gildea denied Cablevision’s motion for summary determination of no violation of Section 337 based on Complainants Verizon Communications, Inc. and Verizon Services Corp. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 10:22 am
NTP has filed suit in the Eastern District of Virginia against the following defendants as named in the litigations: Alltel Corp.; Apple Inc.; AT&T Mobility, LLC; Google Inc.; HTC Corp.; LG Electronics Inc.; Microsoft Corp.; Motorola Inc.; Palm Inc.; Sprint Nextel Corp.; T-Mobile USA Inc.; Verizon Wireless; and Yahoo! [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:45 pm
McKee Foods Corp., 506 F.3d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 2007); see also Lowdermilk v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:32 am
" The suit named 19 defendants, including all of the major cell phone manufacturers and providers, as well as two trade associations: Nokia Inc.; Ericsson Wireless Communications Inc.; Motorola Inc.; Sprint PCS; Audiovox Communications Corp.; Nextel Communications; Panasonic Corp.; Philips Electronics North America Corp.; Qualcomm Inc.; Sanyo North America; Sony Electronics Inc.; AT&T Wireless Services Inc.; Verizon Wireless; Southwestern Bell… [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:08 am
They can switch to a different pay service, and the FCC counts five: “AT&T, DIRECTV, DISH Network, RCN (limited areas of Brooklyn), and Verizon FIOS. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:44 am
Verizon responds that there can be no permanent physical occupation of the plaintiffs' property where it has offered to remove the equipment servicing other buildings. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 7:05 am
Verizon clinton Center Drive Corp. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 12:14 pm
The government's last attempt to require retention of this information, the Internet Stopping Adults Facilitating the Exploitation of Today's Youth Act of 2007 (SAFETY), was widely opposed by lobbyists representing AOL, Verizon Communications Inc., Comcast Corp., AT&T, Microsoft, and Yahoo [the U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 6:04 am
Taito Corp. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:40 pm
’s (“Nonparty”) motion to quash the subpoena duces tecum and ad testificandum served by Complainants Verizon Communications Inc. and Verizon Services Corp. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:12 pm
By way of background, on March 25, 2010, Complainants Verizon Communications Inc. and Verizon Services Corp. and Respondent Cablevision Systems Corp. jointly submitted a motion to amend the Protective Order in order to add enhanced confidentiality provisions to protect the parties’ source code. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:41 pm
According to the Order, ALJ Gildea denied a joint motion filed by Complainants Verizon Communications Inc. and Verizon Services Corp and Respondent Cablevision Systems Corp. which sought to amend the Protective Order in order to add enhanced confidentiality provisions to protect the parties’ source code. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
Desmarais’s work on behalf of Verizon Wireless and several other cellular service providers was selected as Defense Verdict of the Week by The National Law Journal. [read post]
29 May 2010, 6:29 pm
He won’t be able to send troops to protect, say, Verizon’s network. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:50 pm
See Verizon Services Corp. et al. v. [read post]
