Search for: "W' Care, LLC" Results 121 - 140 of 267
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2012, 3:22 am by SHG
  People don't care enough to get off the couch when the problem isn't theirs. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:23 pm by Staci Zaretsky
Schmidt, Malpractice, Medical Malpractice, Penis, Penis Injury, Priapism, Sex, The Doctor's Office LLC, Trazodone [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:08 am by SHG
© 2012 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:07 pm by Schachtman
Conn. 2010) (“The court concludes that it was not necessary for the [expert witness's] initial regression analysis to be contained in the [expert] report” that was disclosed pursuant to Rule 26(a)(2)). [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm by Jeff Klein
The Sixth Circuit began its inquiry by noting that under Tennessee law (similar to many states) a manufacturer must warn of known risks caused by its products or risks that should have been known through exercising reasonable care. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:01 pm by Sheldon Lustigman
In a 345-page Initial Decision by the Chief Administrative Law Judge, the FTC's complaint against POM Wonderful LLC (POM) and its principals was upheld to the extent that the company had claimed that its products would treat, prevent or reduce the risk of heart disease, prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction because these claims were not supported by sufficient competent and reliable evidence. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:14 pm by Steven G. Pearl
 In other words, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by postponing a legal decision on the obligation to provide meal and rest periods, and it may not have abused its discretion by determining those issues at the certification stage, but courts should be very careful about making such determinations before certification. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 3:45 am by SHG
© 2012 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:14 am by Kendall Gray
After the break a brief discussion of: Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm by Law Lady
HARKLEROAD, In his individual capacity, Defendants-Appellants. 11th Circuit.Dissolution of marriage -- Attorney's fees -- Need and ability to pay -- Trial court erred in failing to make finding regarding wife's need and husband's ability to pay wife's temporary attorney fees -- Order is also deficient where trial court failed to make required findings regarding the reasonableness of wife's attorney's hourly rate and… [read post]