Search for: "WILLIAM C WILLIAMS, III" Results 121 - 140 of 943
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2021, 7:06 am by Pete Strom
Highlights of the Richland County mask mandate: The use of a face covering is required within the City of Columbia, including the University of South Carolina and the Williams-Brice Stadium during South Carolina football games. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 5:00 am
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.I send thanks to attorney William C. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 5:00 am
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.I send thanks to attorney William C. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  In Nixon, in a majority opinion written by then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, the Court found a claim by federal Judge Walter Nixon that the impeachment process used against him in the U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 7:07 am by John Jascob
His intention to clean house at the PCAOB came into sharp focus as he removed then-Chair William Duhnke III from his position and replaced him with Acting Chair Duane Desparte. [read post]
 The court also affirmed other established principles concerning water right and physical solution: (i) allocation of native safe yield can be permanent, provided that subsequent unreasonable use may be challenged; (ii) provisions permitting transfer or carrying over of water allocations do not violate the doctrine of reasonable and beneficial use; and (iii) while courts should consider a physical solution regardless of whether all parties agree to it, courts… [read post]
 The court also affirmed other established principles concerning water right and physical solution: (i) allocation of native safe yield can be permanent, provided that subsequent unreasonable use may be challenged; (ii) provisions permitting transfer or carrying over of water allocations do not violate the doctrine of reasonable and beneficial use; and (iii) while courts should consider a physical solution regardless of whether all parties agree to it, courts… [read post]
PG&E’s motion to dismiss alleged that Clarke’s claim is barred by the statute of limitations and is insufficiently pleaded to establish subject matter jurisdiction because Clarke (i) failed to allege an ongoing discharge by a “person”; (ii) failed to allege on ongoing discharge from a “point source”; (iii) and did not provide adequate notice of the claim. [read post]
PG&E’s motion to dismiss alleged that Clarke’s claim is barred by the statute of limitations and is insufficiently pleaded to establish subject matter jurisdiction because Clarke (i) failed to allege an ongoing discharge by a “person”; (ii) failed to allege on ongoing discharge from a “point source”; (iii) and did not provide adequate notice of the claim. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:47 am by Jonathan Shaub
Those issues relate to the federal courts’ jurisdiction under Article III of the Constitution and to the courts’ ability to redress the wrongs alleged in U.S. interbranch disputes. [read post]