Search for: "Werner v. Werner" Results 121 - 140 of 281
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2016, 3:09 am by Peter Mahler
Genovese v Guzman, Decision and Order, Index No. 608246/15 [Sup Ct Nassau County Mar. 31, 2016], is another one of those cases. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:17 am by Peter Mahler
” Strong words, indeed, at the conclusion of a Decision and Order earlier this month by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich in a multi-jurisdictional fight for control of a data marketing company organized as a New York LLC owned by two deeply divided, 50-50 members. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:17 am by Peter Mahler
” Strong words, indeed, at the conclusion of a Decision and Order earlier this month by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich in a multi-jurisdictional fight for control of a data marketing company organized as a New York LLC owned by two deeply divided, 50-50 members. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:17 am by Peter Mahler
” Strong words, indeed, at the conclusion of a Decision and Order earlier this month by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich in a multi-jurisdictional fight for control of a data marketing company organized as a New York LLC owned by two deeply divided, 50-50 members. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 12:00 am by D Daniel Sokol
Philipp Werner, Jones Day has written on HSH Nordbank v Commission: Action for Annulment by Minority Shareholders Against State Aid Decisions Approving Aid in the Form of a Capital Increase. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 9:48 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
As to IP, one recalls Justice Scalia wrote the opinion inMerck v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:50 am by Peter Mahler
Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich (pictured) is not known to mince words, so one has to sit up and take notice when she describes a partnership dissolution case as “yet another unfortunate example of a family business dispute that has developed into needless litigation” whose “outcome here is obvious. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 10:59 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
[/tweet_quote] Special foods and beverages which are simply substitutes for your “normal” diet generally aren’t deductible (Harris v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 3:41 am
René Värk, The Advisory Opinion on Kosovo’s Declaration of Independence: Hopes, Disappointments and Its Relevance to Crimea General ArticlesKoen Lenaerts, EU Values and Constitutional Pluralism: The EU System of Fundamental Rights ProtectionAleksandra Gliszczyńska-Grabias, Memory Laws or Memory Loss? [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
The Anti-Chiu: Florida Court Upholds LLC Member’s Expulsion Froonjian v Ultimate Combatant, LLC, No. 4D14-662 [Fla. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:15 am by Peter Mahler
Take, for example, a case recently decided by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich involving a limited liability company that was up and running for a couple of years before it went insolvent and shut down. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
’ For example, in its interpretation of article V, “A person’s right to use a library should not be denied or abridged because of origin, age, background, or views,” the ALA grounds this right in a democracy’s requirement of an informed citizenry. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Robert Findlay Law Office Professional Corporation v Werner, 2015 ONSC 2955 [1] The individuals in this lawsuit are lawyers. [read post]
17 May 2015, 2:57 am by Matthias Weller
Siehr recalled the landmark cases of Attorney-General of New Zealand v Ortiz, [1984] AC 1, Winkworth v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Stofko of the Scranton office of the Cipriani & Werner law firm.Source of photo:  John Belushi from Animal House (1978). [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
Last October I wrote about Zelouf Int’l Corp. v Zelouf, an important post-trial decision in which, among other significant rulings, Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich refused to apply a discount for lack of marketability (DLOM) in a statutory fair value proceeding triggered by a freeze-out merger of a family-owned business. [read post]