Search for: "Winke v. Winke" Results 121 - 140 of 226
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2012, 5:12 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 609(b) provides that This subdivision (b) applies if more than 10 years have passed since the witness’s conviction or release from confinement for it, whichever is later. [read post]
14 May 2012, 12:00 am
Today, the Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia is hearing oral arguments in Prosecutor v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation There are no newly adjudicated cases to report but several resolved cases: Peter Reynolds v Daily Mail (Clause 1, 27/04/2012); A man v Huddersfield Daily Examiner (Clause 1, 27/04/2012); Mr Smith on behalf of Gaoh Energy Ltd v Tamworth Herald (Clause 1, 27/04/2012); Mr Patrick McCadden v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 27/04/2012); A woman v North Devon Journal (Clause 1, 3, 27/04/2012); A woman v Western Daily Press (Clause 5,… [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:17 am by Josh Sturtevant
More often than not, this mention is followed by a knowing wink and a statement along the lines of 'if I knew how that worked, I would say something more about it now, but isn't the idea itself just so exciting? [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 9:03 am by Alfred Brophy
Cribbing now a little from the book's web page: This book uses the landmark case Jones v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Kali Borkoski
Or should the Court grant review in Arizona v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:33 pm
This auto-crash was investigated by the Missouri State Highway Patrol with the assistance of Sergeant V. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:02 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Courts have precluded the use of class actions against drug makers in most cases (see, e.g., Valentino v. [read post]