Search for: "Woodall"
Results 121 - 140
of 223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2013, 7:01 pm
Woodall is here. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Woodall, which Jordan Steiker previewed for this blog. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 8:48 am
Woodall: (1) Whether the Sixth Circuit violated 28 U.S.C. 2254(d)(1) by granting habeas relief on the trial court's failure to provide a no adverse inference instruction even though... [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 7:57 am
Woodall, the U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 3:52 am
Woodall, which he describes as asking the Court to decide how a federal court should “apply the so-called ‘deference’ standard of 28 USC §2254(d)(1) when the ‘clearly established federal law’ that the habeas petitioner seeks to invoke was established in a different context? [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 12:55 pm
Woodall says the law is the law and he intends to vigorously uphold it. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:07 pm
Woodall – duty of judge in a death-penalty case to instruct the jurors to draw no conclusion from the fact that the accused person did not testify during sentencing [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioner in BG Group PLC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 6:57 am
Woodall III, Joel Alfonso, Simon Rasin, and Lauren A. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:29 am
Woodall: (1) Whether the Sixth Circuit violated 28 U.S.C. 2254(d)(1) by granting habeas relief on the trial court's failure to provide a no... [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am
Woodall, 12-794. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm
Woodall, 12-794 (the Sixth Circuit state-on-top habeas case now relisted for a sixth time since the Court received the record); Gallow v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
Woodall, 12-794, a state-on-topper out of the Sixth, is back for its third trip to the all-you-can-eat relist buffet. [read post]
29 May 2013, 11:36 am
Woodall, 12-794, both state-on-top habeas cases. [read post]
29 May 2013, 6:19 am
Woodall III. [read post]
24 May 2013, 8:52 am
Woodall, Case 12-794, questioning “(1) Whether the Sixth Circuit violated 28 U.S.C. 2254(d)(1) by granting habeas relief on the trial court's failure to provide a no [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:18 am
Woodall, 12-794, comes to us out of the Sixth Circuit, meaning it’s yet another state-on-top habeas case. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 3:26 pm
Source: Mercury News Article by Angela Woodall, dated October 1, 2012. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 11:51 am
I have written before about court opinions concluding that rape shield rules cover only other consensual sexual acts by the alleged victims and not other nonconsensual sexual acts by alleged victims. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 7:08 am
” Woodall v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 7:20 pm
See also Woodall v. [read post]
