Search for: "v. State of Oklahoma et al" Results 121 - 140 of 263
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2017, 9:09 am by Wolfgang Demino
 [12/5/2017 UPDATE: See subsequent blog post on--> Judge Kelly's TRO ruling from the bench in English v Trump et Mulvaney with hotlink to full transcript.]TEXT OF STATE OF TEXAS AMICUS MOTION Motion of the States of Texas, West Virginia, Alabama, Arkansas,Georgia, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and South Carolina To File Brief asAmici Curiae in Support of Defendants:The States of Texas, West Virginia, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia,Louisiana,… [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 9:09 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017) 11/28/2017 11  MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Kel [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 1:49 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
  Although this approach minimizes security concerns, recent research by Meredith Rossner, et. al. suggests that jurors are subconsciously influenced by this social cue of dangerousness, and this has an impact on verdicts. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Plaintiffs Lenny and Tracy Chapman filed a lawsuit against Hiland Partners GP Holdings LLC, et al. who owned and operated a natural gas plant in North Dakota. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:44 am by Charles Sartain
Co-author Chance Decker Enterprise Products Partners, L.P. et al v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 5:04 am by Charles Sartain
Chesapeake Operating LLC et al is news more shocking than “Man Bites Dog”! [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
Amgen Inc., et al., 15-1039 and Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 4:03 am by Charles Sartain
Peters, et al. reminds us of the directive imposed by Oklahoma’s constructive notice doctrine:  Read and understand documents that you sign affecting your land. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Even under the appropriately exacting standards of New York Times v. [read post]