Search for: "v. The Boeing Company"
Results 121 - 140
of 300
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2016, 3:37 pm
Boeing Co., a former Boeing employee brought a claim under the Washington Family Leave Act, alleging that Boeing could not require an employee to to notify his manager in addition to requesting leave through a company hotline. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 11:40 am
The Boeing Company announced yesterday that it had signed a memorandum of understanding with Iran Air, the Iranian national carrier, that expresses “the airline’s intent to purchase Boeing commercial passenger airplanes. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:05 am
The Boeing Company. [read post]
9 May 2016, 8:55 am
Boeing Company - 5/5/16. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:27 pm
You might want to read Egelhoff v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 3:00 am
Similarly, in Allen v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 6:21 am
Denying her summary judgment motion in whole and Boeing’s motion in part, the court found that fact questions existed as to whether the company’s placement of the employee on unpaid leave showed a discriminatory animus, as to why it revoked an internal job offer while she was on leave, and as to whether Boeing’s claim that it terminated her because of her disruptive behavior rather than her disability was pretextual (Huge v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 4:18 pm
**Many high profile companies have had California Bus. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 3:00 am
These include UCB Pharma; Boeing; US Dept of HHS; Sanofi-Aventis; and US Smokeless Tobacco Company, as examples. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 5:52 am
The Boeing Company ("Boeing") filed a motion to stay pending inter partes review" ("IPR") after Boeing had requested that the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") conduct an inter partes review of U.S. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:51 am
The guy who allegedly tried to hack the airplane in flight wasn’t copying Boeing’s software. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:35 am
The Boeing Company, was filed in the District of Kansas; the case numbers are 05-CV-1251-MLB-KMH and 07-CV-1043-MLB-KMH. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 6:56 am
However, where the employee failed to show that his neck injury was a “substantial factor” in Boeing’s decision to terminate his employment, his discrimination and failure-to-accommodate claims under the Washington Law Against Discrimination (WLAD) failed to survive (Jury v. [read post]
Do pregnant workers get ‘most-favored-employee’ status in High Court’s pregnancy accommodation case?
26 Mar 2015, 11:05 am
Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Kennedy and Thomas joined (Young v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm
The Boeing Company (10thCir., March 3, 2015) (affirming summary judgment in favor of Boeing becauseMcDonald could show no pretext for his termination)McCauley v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
Legal and tax incentives have been established through several laws for companies basing themselves in one of the country’s free or special economic and trade zones.The Colón Free Zone (CFZ), the second-largest of its kind in the world, is a strong example of the importance of creating such areas, in particular for logistic and reexport companies. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:20 pm
Garza and The Boeing Company and the Greater Kelly Development Authority N/K/A the Port of San Antonio v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:05 am
B&B Hardware v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 4:26 pm
While they were married, David Egelhoff designated his wife, Donna Rae, as beneficiary of the life insurance and retirement account he held through Boeing Company. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 4:26 pm
While they were married, David Egelhoff designated his wife, Donna Rae, as beneficiary of the life insurance and retirement account he held through Boeing Company. [read post]
