Search for: "Hands On Originals, Inc."
Results 1381 - 1400
of 3,492
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2016, 2:11 pm
Pierce Foundations, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 2:11 pm
Pierce Foundations, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 2:14 pm
Stephen Slesinger, Inc. and the Second Circuit in Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 1:18 am
This question was answered by the Federal Court of Canada in early May.The case of Judy Maltz and others v Jennifer Witterick and Penguin Canada Books Inc. dealt with the documentary "No. 4 Street of Our Lady", which delved into the life of Francizska Halamajowa and her daughter Helena, who lived in Polan during World War 2 during the country's occupation by the Germans. [read post]
23 May 2016, 6:28 am
Luigino’s, Inc., 423 F.3d 137 (2d Cir. 2005) (confusion over endorsement of or other involvement in defendant’s product was actionable); Original Appalachian Artworks, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 6:26 am
If the focus was on the original 1912 building then then the standards did not apply. [read post]
18 May 2016, 4:18 pm
Up, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 1:13 pm
The whistleblower and original bringer of the qui tam suit, Dr. [read post]
18 May 2016, 1:13 pm
The whistleblower and original bringer of the qui tam suit, Dr. [read post]
18 May 2016, 1:13 pm
The whistleblower and original bringer of the qui tam suit, Dr. [read post]
18 May 2016, 1:13 pm
The whistleblower and original bringer of the qui tam suit, Dr. [read post]
17 May 2016, 10:42 am
Mil-Tech Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 10:39 am
In Canada, Tele-Direct (Publications) Inc. v American Business Information Inc. [read post]
16 May 2016, 5:57 am
As explained by the Virginia Supreme Court in Gazette, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 5:57 am
As explained by the Virginia Supreme Court in Gazette, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 1:30 am
In her view, the use would have to be, contrary to the aforementioned judgments, as a 'badge of origin' and not merely in the course of trade (whether used as a badge or not). [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:34 am
There were also cases in which very small amounts of original material were denied copyright protection. [read post]
12 May 2016, 10:11 am
Tyson Foods, Inc., No. 15-cv-00946 (E.D. [read post]
12 May 2016, 4:34 am
" (TriMed, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 10:20 pm
There have been no confirmed reports of illness or adverse reactions due to consumption of Ajinomoto Windsor Inc. [read post]
