Search for: "DOES 1-19" Results 1401 - 1420 of 19,422
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2021, 10:29 am by Kristen Lee
However, when Congress passed a $2 trillion COVID-19 stimulus bill in March of 2020, members of Congress opted to treat the District of Columbia as a territory, shortchanging D.C. residents a full $755 million in relief at a time when D.C. had more COVID-19 cases than 19 other states. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 3:21 pm by Larry
The scope does not include internal or external tooth washers, nor does it include spring lock washers made of other metals, such as copper. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 7:58 am by Reshma Kishnani
COVID-19 has had an impact across the legal sector including for Estate practitioners. [read post]
By way of background, OSHA has explained that a COVID-19 case is a recordable illness if (1) an employee is positive or presumptively positive for COVID-19; (2) the case is work-related; and (3) the case results in medical treatment beyond first aid or days away from work. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:17 pm by Jacque
October 25, 2021 Intense workplace stress has been on the rise in the United States for years, and the problem has only been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.A 2018 Gallup survey of 7,500 workers found that almost 1 in 4 (23%) were feeling burnt out at work. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:38 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
McGee'.s prior work at Mandiant as including "negotiat[ion] and finali[zation]" of Mandiant's sale, (D.I. 99, ex. 1 at 1); but now, PhishMe states that this description is incorrect (or perhaps, at least a bit misleading), (D.I. 103, [*19] ex. 1 at~ 5 (Mr. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:08 am by Sheppard Mullin
In exchange, Solvay paid $12 million to Paddock, $60 million to Par and $19-$30 million annually for nine years to Actavis. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:08 am by Bradley Graveline
In exchange, Solvay paid $12 million to Paddock, $60 million to Par and $19-$30 million annually for nine years to Actavis. [read post]
The conduct of business from temporary locations, such as an employee’s home, as part of a firm’s business continuity plan due to circumstances related to COVID-19 does not require an update to either Item 1.F of Part 1A or Section 1.F of Schedule D. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 8:47 am
”Trebro Mfg., Inc. at *10 (citation omitted).Claim 1Claim 1 is pertinent for this appeal: 1. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 12:36 am by Abhinav Chandrachud
There are tensions between cultural preservation and national integration, between Article 19(1)(d) and Article 29(1). [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 11:01 am by oliver randl
Thus, claim 1 does not require the teeth to be adjacent. [read post]