Search for: "One Clothing Inc" Results 1421 - 1440 of 1,631
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2009, 5:15 am
  Jeffrey Windle, 42, entered the courtroom wearing brown and tan prison clothes. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 4:20 pm
A description: Lawyers from prominent area law firms will compete in a hotly contested sixth annual Battle of the Law Firm Bands to benefit Gifts for the Homeless, Inc. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 2:54 am
In re Blue Heaven Hosiery Co., Inc., Serial No. 76687280 (May 26, 2009) [not precedential].The Examining Attorney submitted more than a dozen registrations identifying goods from both the application and the cited registration. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 10:31 am
He’s made it up out of whole cloth, based on his personal views on parenting. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
While the other side's apologists have been out in force gnashing their teeth and rending their clothes, support (at least in the blogosphere) has been sparse for what's really a quite practical and common-sense pair of decisions. [read post]
27 May 2009, 6:46 pm
Written by Isaac Rudik at Compliance Solutions Canada Inc. [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:28 am
., is one of the most popular projects for the S.C. [read post]
18 May 2009, 6:45 am by Sheppard Mullin
Where the Amway case described characteristics of a legitimate MLM plan, a number of suits brought by the FTC against clothing and cosmetics distributors have provided guidance as to what constitutes an illegal pyramid scheme [See Ger-Ro-Mar, Inc., 84 F.T.C. 95 (1974) (cosmetics); Holiday Magic, Inc., 84 F.T.C. 748 (1974) (cosmetics and toiletries); Koscot Interplanetary, Inc., 86 F.T.C. 1106 (1975) (brassiere, lingerie, and swimwear)]. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
13 May 2009, 10:30 am
Great Harvesting Franchising, Inc. involved two Appeals under section 56 of the Trade-marks Act from decisions of the Opposition Board. [read post]