Search for: "One Clothing Inc" Results 1441 - 1460 of 1,631
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2009, 3:32 am
Lowe's Home Centers Inc., 2009 WL 1010883 (6th Cir. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:00 pm
It was clear who were the good nations and who were the evil ones. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 12:02 pm
  A  Texas company,  "Super Happy Fun Fun, Inc. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 8:39 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: French Parliament passes 3-strikes HADOPI law (Ars Technica) (Media Wonk) (TorrentFreak) (IPKat) (Out-Law) (Intellectual Property Watch) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) USTR releases ACTA summary (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) (Out-Law) (Intellectual Property Watch) Court of Appeals for the… [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 12:01 am
See In re Sauer, 27 USPQ2d 1073 (TTAB 1993); In re Steak and Ale Restaurants of America, Inc., 185 USPQ 447 (TTAB 1975). [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
The Habit is used in one way and one way only: it is worn by applicant's members. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Ecko wrote back to BLE stating that it had obtained a license to the use Lee's image from A.V.E.L.A., Inc. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 2:53 am
Wal-Mart, Inc., a Title VII case brought by current and former employees alleging sexual discrimination as to pay and managerial promotions. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 8:06 am
The scheme apparently lasted more than seven years and Yeomans used more than $6 million for gambling and other funds for clothing, shoes, home improvements and the like. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 9:50 am
Before doing so, he and his wife stuffed bundles of cash into duffel bags and their clothing to smuggle into Mexico, prosecutors say in court papers. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
"Noting that any doubts on mere descriptiveness are to be resolved in favor of Applicant, the Board reversed the refusal.TTABlog comment: One thing that troubles me about this decision is the fact that Applicant's goods are not limited to "environmentally-aware" clothing. [read post]