Search for: "Hands On Originals, Inc."
Results 1461 - 1480
of 3,492
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2016, 1:30 am
On the other hand, in S&L Vitamins, Inc v Australian Gold, Inc, it was deemed this was the case, and that the incorporation of metatags would not constitute a use of a mark and therefore infringe it.As can be seen, the status of metatags and trademarks is quite uncertain, although the Canadian perspective seems a lot more clear. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 10:58 am
Subaru of America, Inc., Dist. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 11:56 am
” (Citing Malibu Mountains Recreation, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:42 am
"Systems Inc. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:19 am
However, to the extent the UCL claim is based on implicitly misleading statements regarding the true origin of the “Rift” product, this is disconnected from Total Recall’s true injury, which is misappropriation of information. __ Practitioners, entrepreneurs, and law students can all benefit from reading the agreement and seeing its fallout. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:37 am
, supra (emphasis in original). [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 8:48 am
” The Virginia Supreme Court implicitly adopted the Restatement position in Food Lion, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 8:48 am
” The Virginia Supreme Court implicitly adopted the Restatement position in Food Lion, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:46 am
As a a manufacturer of handbags, wallets, and other luxury goods, the company has its hands full just addressing counterfeit products. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 6:25 am
My Other Bag , Inc., No. 14-CV-3419 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 6:51 am
FCNH, Inc., January 5, 2016, Briscoe, M.). [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:08 pm
The Eastern District Of California’s Martin Decision On the one hand, in In re Martin, 508 B.R. 717 (Bankr. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 7:02 am
Polaris Industries, Inc., plaintiff had asked trial court to amend the original complaint to add new legal theories and also request additional discovery. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 7:02 am
Polaris Industries, Inc., plaintiff had asked trial court to amend the original complaint to add new legal theories and also request additional discovery. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 7:02 am
Polaris Industries, Inc., plaintiff had asked trial court to amend the original complaint to add new legal theories and also request additional discovery. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 7:02 am
Polaris Industries, Inc., plaintiff had asked trial court to amend the original complaint to add new legal theories and also request additional discovery. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:20 am
On December 29, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Dillon v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
The bad Wimbushcase (2008 -1) – from the same court of appeals (indeed, both originating in N.D. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
District Judge Colleen McMahon rejected Sirius’ arguments that Flo & Eddie Inc, controlled by founding band members Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman, did not own copyrights in The Turtles’ recordings or that Sirius had an “implied” license to play Turtles' songs. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:50 pm
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc. (2015), which held that a specialty license plate program constituted “government speech,” so that the government could discriminate based on viewpoint in deciding which plates to allow: The government’s argument in this case that trademark registration amounts to government speech is at odds with the Supreme Court’s analysis in Walker and unmoored from the very concept of government speech. [read post]
