Search for: "DOES 1-19" Results 1481 - 1500 of 19,422
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2022, 1:34 am by Rose Hughes
"[T]he mere indication that the embodiment does not or no longer fall under the respective claim(s) is not sufficient in this regard". [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 10:51 am by Ilya Somin
This perception gap is mirrored by an overestimation of investment from China, which people think makes up 19% of inward investment but actually only accounts for 1%9. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:38 am
Playdom, 113 USPQ2d at 2044 (citing MCCARTHY ON TRADEMARKS AND UNFAIR COMPETITION § 19:103 (4th ed. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 4:39 am by Jon L. Gelman
Pending NJ Supreme Court Cases of InterestA-23-19 Mary Richter v. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 10:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Foundation Fitness LLC, 2021 WL 2689852, No. 1:19-cv-1678-AT (N.D. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 6:39 am
How exactly does the law regulate humor, and how does that change across different judicial systems or historical periods? [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 6:39 am by Christine Corcos
How exactly does the law regulate humor, and how does that change across different judicial systems or historical periods? [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 8:53 am by Christopher G. Hill
Coronavirus is dominating the news and planning for the effects of COVID-19 is a big deal for construction companies in the Commonwealth. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 5:03 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
A staggering 1 million infections were reported in Africa in just one month, with few vaccines in sight. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 7:55 am by Brigitta Burguess
It has revealed that present data does not support that (1):  Being pregnant puts someone at an increased risk of acquiring COVID-19. [read post]
  Appellants filed their revised brief on June 1, 2021 in which they argue that the FTC does not have the authority to impose some of the remedies that the FTC has imposed. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
This is particularly so because under Article 1 of the Convention, the Convention does not apply at all where the defendant’s address is unknown. [read post]