Search for: "DOES 1-19" Results 1481 - 1500 of 19,422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2023, 9:20 am by Marcel Pemsel
Substantial value to the goods (Art. 7(1)(e)(iii) CTMR, now Art. 7(1)(e)(iii) EUTMR) The General Court held that the contested mark does not represent a sign, which consists exclusively of the shape of the goods. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 1:00 am by Rose Hughes
However, purposive construction does not allow an obviously deliberate limitation in the claims to be ignored. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 12:46 pm by Caitlin Lentz
  But now that both the state and federal emergency-statuses are lifted, what does that mean for the telemedicine prescribing exceptions available during COVID-19? [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:42 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 60/210.1(a) A summons still has to be issued and served in an emergency order of protection it just does not have to be served in advance of the hearing. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
The majority opinion does so by concluding, inter alia, that medical and religious exemptions are not comparable for free exercise purposes as a matter of law. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The SEC’s actions are a response to the outflows experienced by certain types of MMFs in March 2020 during the economic shock related to the COVID-19 pandemic which resulted in intervention by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”).[1] As proposed, the SEC amended rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act to remove (i) the temporary redemption gate provisions and (ii) the tie between liquidity fees and weekly liquid asset… [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am by Joel R. Brandes
 August 2, 2023Appellate Division, First DepartmentAge 29 Law allows unmarried children through age 29, regardless of financial dependence, to be covered under a parent’s group health insurance policy  In B.D. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
Continental Casualty Co., 65 F.4th 1005 (8th Cir. 2023) (applying Minnesota law), the Eighth Circuit recently held, consistent with overwhelming law across the country, that the presence of the COVID-19 virus in the air or on a surface at an insured premises does not constitute ‘direct physical loss of or damage to property’ under a property insurance policy. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 5:04 am by INFORRM
Both videos contained interviews between Plaintiff 1 and Plaintiff 2, who claimed that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a working and proven drug against COVID-19. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 3:13 pm by Bill Marler
 The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 19(7), e226–e236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30789-8 [3]           Casillas, Ibid, Note 1 at Page 1 [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 2:12 am by Rose Hughes
The Patentee argued that these steps contributed to a technical effect and had therefore to be taken into consideration when examining for inventive step (G 1/19). [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 10:48 am by Dennis Crouch
Although Pfizer obviously does not want to be liable for patent infringement here, Pfizer also holds and is seeking numerous patents on its own related technology. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 5:51 am by Tom Joscelyn
Of course, the indictment does not cite all the evidence they have in their possession. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:12 am by Shrivar Chendip
It therefore does not constitute an oath nor an affirmation, as required by the Regulations. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:16 am by Rose Hughes
 In considering the legal basis for its decision, the Board of Appeal cited with approval T 2432/19 and T 1171/20 (IPKat). [read post]