Search for: "AS IP Holdings Inc."
Results 141 - 160
of 1,436
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2021, 8:17 am
This circular logic reminded me a little of one of my least-favorite trademark cases of all time, the SMJ Group, Inc. v. 417 Lafayette Restaurant case. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 6:28 am
When teaching staff at a university make copies for their students’ education, they are not “hid[ing] behind the shield of the user’s allowable purpose in order to engage in a separate purpose that tends to make the dealing unfair”.It was therefore an error for the Court of Appeal, in addressing the purpose of the dealing, to hold that it is only the “institution’s perspective that matters” and that York’s financial purpose was a “clear… [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:47 am
Max’s massive collection of invaluable, original artwork, IP, and licensing rights is owned by ALP, Inc., a corporation formed for the production, maintenance, marketing, licensing, and commercialization of his artwork. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 10:10 am
An audio version of this episode can be found on “The Briefing from the IP Law Blog” podcast, available on Apple/Spotify/Sticher/Google platforms or online here: [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 10:30 am
IP Video Corporation, 2021 WL 744511 (SDNY Feb. 26, 2021). [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 8:48 am
If the signals are portents, then many settled doctrines of patent law – and other fields of IP law as well – have been quietly but surely put into play.HoldingThe holding in Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 2:04 pm
The lone hold-over case is American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm
© 2016 Subway IP Inc. submul 26184[.] [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 9:41 am
Snap Inc., No. 20-55295 (9th Cir. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
In its most recent manifestations one sees the imposition of public pressure on the National Basketball Association and on Apple Inc. respecting their entanglement in Xinjiang that increasingly serves as the defining point for the difference between US and Chinese normative approaches to public governance; here and here). [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 5:00 pm
©2016 Subway IP Inc. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 7:21 am
The Supreme Court has been holding a petition for certiari to review the decision in hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 2:07 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB/ Board) in an inter partes review, holding the PTAB properly construed the claim language in the case of Apple Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:36 am
See NASCAR Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:12 pm
Wok & Pan, Ind., Inc., 909 F.3d 1134, 1139 (Fed. [read post]
12 May 2021, 9:15 am
Restating the Holding. [read post]
7 May 2021, 1:58 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
7 May 2021, 12:32 pm
As with many technical innovations, things move pretty fast, and this means that legal entities need to act now to protect the qualities of human existence that we currently hold dear. [read post]
6 May 2021, 9:27 am
Gleissner is infamous within IP circles for his large portfolio of domain names, companies and trade marks, with seemingly little to no goodwill as a foundation. [read post]
2 May 2021, 1:41 pm
Hologic Inc. [read post]
