Search for: "AT&T Mobility II LLC" Results 141 - 160 of 199
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2021, 2:54 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  According to Bloomberg columnist Chris Bryant:   There will always be tension between shareholders’ important right to seek legal redress and ensuring companies don’t spend all their time in court. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 26 conference)   AT&T, Inc v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
(Spicy IP) The ‘Numbers’ continue to talk – PPL’s revenues from mobile ringtones has zoomed up by 1857% in 6 years; from Rs. 7 crores to Rs. 137 crores (Spicy IP) Copyright Office provides PPL’s Annual Report for 08-09; Rs. 100 crores earned from ringtone and web streaming! [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
§ 1 et seq., as held by this Court in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Techdirt) (Hal Wegner) Reactions to Patent Reform Bill 2009 (IP Watchdog) (Patent Baristas) (IP Watchdog) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) Worries about our patent system (The Invent Blog)   US Patents Licensing Executives Society urges… [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
(IAM) European Audio-Visual Observatory publishes paper ‘An Introduction to Music Rights for Film and Television Production’ (At Last... the 1709 Copyright Blog) PGI/PDO applications and amendments: Redykolka cheese from Poland; Spanish meat product Jamón de Teruel; Polish cheese Wielkopolski ser smazony; Hungarian meat product Budapesti téliszalámi (Class 46) (Class 46) What is a ‘covenant not to sue’? [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Olsher, where a mobile home park tenant injured in a gang-related shootout involving another tenant sued the landlord, claiming it "had breached a duty not to rent to known gang members. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
While the Supreme Court didn’t cause that result directly, the lower courts that did cause it could not have done their work without reliance on two factually idiosyncratic opinions issued more than forty years ago. [read post]