Search for: "Advanced Composites, Inc." Results 141 - 160 of 266
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Plenary Session: Measuring Consumer Confusion in Trademark InfringementFacilitator: Barton Beebe (NYU) Lanham Act: confusion is vaguely defined. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 6:33 am by Joy Waltemath
Therefore, the composition of an MAE’s accounts had the potential to seriously affect salary. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:20 am by Jim Liles
Pro Football, Inc., resulted from a proceeding to cancel six trademark registrations used by the Washington Redskins football team. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:40 am by WIMS
<> Comments on EPA's Formaldehyde Emissions Standards for Composite Wood Products - The U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 6:18 am by David Jensen
Stanford and Stanford faculty-founded companies such as Stem Cells Inc, are blatantly promoted over others. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 8:48 am by Dennis Crouch
It calls on a computer to do nothing that is even arguably an advance in physical implementations of routine mental information-comparison and rule-application processes. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:59 am by Terry Hart
An exclusive right to perform dramatic compositions to the public for profit was added to copyright law in 1856.7 The right to public performance was extended to musical compositions in 1897.8 In 1909 Congress passed a major revision to the Copyright Act. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 8:10 am by Steven Boranian
We all know that failure-to-warn and design defect claims against generic drug manufacturers are preempted, thanks to PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 10:31 am by Dennis Crouch
And, until the advancement made by the inventors of the ′013 patent, no one had proposed a new formulation that would be storage stable. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Electronic Arts, Inc., No. 11-3750 (3d Cir. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
The doctrine of inherent anticipation (particularly after Schering Co. v Geneva Pharmaceuticals Inc. et Al., commented here - see also, in the UK, Merrell Dow v H N Norton & Co), may lead to similar distortions. [read post]