Search for: "Americans for Clean Energy v. EPA" Results 141 - 160 of 315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2014, 7:44 am by WIMS
<> Stimulus Dollars Advance Energy Efficiency And Renewable Energy In America's Cities - The nation's mayors this week released the results of a new survey pointing to city successes in using Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) program funding under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 12:04 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Chamber of Commerce et al v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:05 am by WIMS
EPA, will decide whether the Clean Air Act's permitting requirements apply to major industrial sources of the carbon pollution that. . . [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
EME Homer City Generation and American Lung Association v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm by John Elwood
Environmental Protection Agency, 12-1153; American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 7:44 pm by Mary Dwyer
  American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:50 pm by WIMS
It will also ensure that our investments in clean energy go to sources that are actually clean." [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
In its opinion, a panel of three judges concluded that the EPA acted within its authority under the Clean Air Act (CAA) in issuing the four regulations. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:34 pm by WIMS
EPA and Administration's ability to regulate greenhouse gases (GHG) under the Clean Air Act [See WIMS 6/26/12]. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm by WIMS
The Appeals Court summarizes its position saying, "The question before us is whether the Clean Air Act, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) action that the Act authorizes, displaces Kivalina's claims. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Circuit opinion in the controversial E15 (15 ethanol mix with gasoline) split decision in Grocery Manufacturers Assoc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:17 pm by WIMS
The Appeals Court explains that the case arises from a final action of EPA determining that a natural gas sweetening plant and various sour gas production wells, commonly owned by Petitioner Summit Petroleum Corporation (Summit) and separately located within an area of approximately forty-three square miles, constitute a single stationary source under the EPA's Clean Air Act Title V permitting program. [read post]