Search for: "B M v STATE" Results 141 - 160 of 7,059
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am by Marty Lederman
  At that point, most states will probably continue to include Trump’s name on their general election ballots (especially if their state laws don’t authorize any exclusion, which might be true in the vast majority of states). [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[2]  In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
On Wednesday, I received a letter from Bryan M. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am by Daniel J. Gilman
First, there is a structural presumption of illegality if the post-merger HHI is (a) greater than 1,800 and (b) the change in HHI is greater than 100. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 7:16 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Patent Office issued the following xxx patents to persons and businesses in Indiana in November 2023: PATENT NUMBER PATENT TITLE US 11826689 B2 Air filter arrangement; assembly; and, methods US 11830717 B2 Ion focusing US 11826832 B2 Passivation and alloying element retention in gas atomized powders US 11830716 B2 Mass spectrometry analysis of microorganisms in samples US 11828908 B2 Rack-mountable equipment with a high-heat-dissipation module, and transceiver receptacle with increased cooling US… [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
It could also be true if there are net gains to labor across states A and B, where harms in one labor market are offset by gains in another. [read post]