Search for: "B. Sullivan" Results 141 - 160 of 1,197
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2022, 3:58 am by Dan Harris
China is the highest risk country, by far, in terms of likelihood of getting hit by duties, and the list of Chinese products subject to duties is roughly five times more than any other country. b. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Sullivan as Historical Analogue, (Florida International University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 22-03 (2022).From SmartCILP and elsewhere:Thomas E. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
Lapsley shall: (a) serve as a neutral, independent expert unbeholden to any of the parties; and (b) assist the Court by providing expert analysis and opinions concerning defendants’ compliance with specified provisions in the Court’s enforcement orders” according to the draft ruling. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 1:32 pm by Emily Dai
The panel will feature Naw K’nyaw Paw, general secretary of the Karen Women’s Organization, and Dan Sullivan, deputy director for Africa, Asia, and the Middle East at Refugees International. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 9:23 am by Eugene Volokh
[Washington Governor Jay Inslee is supporting a law that would ban lies about election results that “are likely to incite or cause lawlessness”—an argument much like that made by supporters of the Sedition Act of 1798.] [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 7:23 am by John Bellinger
Sullivan said: “It’s very troubling to hear someone say the reason they entered the Capitol on January 6 was essentially to murder the Speaker of the House. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a threshold matter, respondent argues that the appeal must be dismissed because the November 2020 order does not constitute a final judgment (see CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Alexander M. v Cleary, 188 AD3d 1471, 1473 [2020]; see also CPLR 5701 [a] [1]). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a threshold matter, respondent argues that the appeal must be dismissed because the November 2020 order does not constitute a final judgment (see CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Alexander M. v Cleary, 188 AD3d 1471, 1473 [2020]; see also CPLR 5701 [a] [1]). [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm by Darren Tyus
As you can see, this legislation would greatly expand the employer/carrier’s exposure. [1] Analyzing COVID-19 Claims Under the Longshore & Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act by Alan Brackett and Dan Sullivan [2] Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs COVID-19 FAQ’s for Employers and Carriers [3] H.R. 3114. [4] H.R. 3114 (b). [5] H.R. 3114 (b)(2) [6] Analyzing COVID-19 Claims Under the Longshore & Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act… [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 1:34 pm by Emily Dai
The committee will hear testimony from Scott Belcher, president and chief executive officer of SFB Consulting; Megan Samford, vice president and chief product security officer of Schneider Electric; Thomas Farmer, assistant vice president of security at the Association of American Railroads; Michael Stephens, general counsel and executive vice president at the Tampa International Airport; John Sullivan, chief engineer at the Boston Water and Sewer Commission; and Gary Kessler, president of… [read post]