Search for: "Basic Concepts Inc" Results 141 - 160 of 1,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2014, 7:05 am by Ronald Mann
For reasons rooted in the Supreme Court’s narrow conception of the Commerce Clause in the nineteenth century, trademark rights arise under state law – for the most part, state common law. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 7:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Direct Marketing Concepts, Inc., No. 09-2172 (1st Cir. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 10:59 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Luke has been ordered to pay $61,000 of his personal money, while his company, Kasz Money Inc., will have to pay $189,000. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 6:39 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See PharmaStem Therapeutics, Inc. v.ViaCell, Inc., 491 F.3d 1342, 1363-64 (Fed. [read post]
Reins left many legal pundits scratching their heads as it seemed to fly in the face of basic concepts of standing, they could perhaps reconcile the conclusion with the fact that at least the plaintiff in that action had claims within the statutory period. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 6:31 am by Unknown
The Ninth Circuit, though, held otherwise, reasoning that Item 303’s disclosure requirement varies from the Basic test for materiality.In the Illinois district court’s view, the Ninth Circuit conflated the distinct concepts of duty to disclose and materiality. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 6:04 am
This no-action letter builds upon a lot of concepts (e.g., formula pricing, stock option repricing exchange offers, etc.), In short, the Staff basically is allowing a company - and its wholly-owned sub - that are going public in an IPO to approach some employees and make an exchange offer for options and restricted stock held by the employees. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 11:41 am
And now, in a move that has shaken up the e-learning community, Blackboard Inc. has been awarded a patent establishing its claims to some of the basic features of the software that powers online education. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:26 pm
Further to this morning's earlier posts (see immediately below), the IPKat can now say a bit about the approach taken by the House of Lords to the proper test of inventive step in Conor Medsystems Inc v Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc. [read post]