Search for: "Brown v. State of Louisiana"
Results 141 - 160
of 393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2009, 6:05 am
LEXIS 106800 (WD LA, Dec. 16, 2008), a Louisiana federal magistrate judge recommended dismissal of a plaintiff's claim that his free exercise rights were violated when, because of his confinement in lock-down, he was prohibited from attending church services.In Brown v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 4:18 am
” At The Times Picayune, Heather Nolan reports that a Louisiana “landowner’s fight with the federal government over whether his private property should become a new breeding ground for the endangered dusky gopher frog- which last was seen in the parish more than 50 years ago – could be nearing the end of a six-year legal battle” when the Supreme Court decides Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:26 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:56 am
Brown v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Feb. 17, 2012) (applying Twombly “plausible on its face” standard in context of fraudulent joinder; denying remand); Brown v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 3:30 am
Brown v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
In Heien v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:15 am
In this case, a Texas plaintiff filed suit against a New York defendant and two Louisiana defendants in Louisiana state court. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 4:07 am
” At ACSblog, Ronald Sullivan urges the Court to grant review in the case of David Brown, a Louisiana death-row inmate, arguing that only the Court “can now correct matters and give the state’s prosecutors and courts direction on the due process rights of defendants. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 2:59 am
[Jay Schweikart on Cato amicus in case of U.S. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 1:55 pm
Texas and Louisiana went to federal court in Texas to challenge the policy. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
It asks (1) whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that the state’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence violated its obligation under Brady v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed… [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Would that be reviewable by a court, given that it involves a question of the validity to state law? [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Just as, in our era, prospective Supreme Court Justices must explain how their judicial philosophy approves of the 1954 Brown v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
The court granted vacatur under United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
Brown, 10-76. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Murthy v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm
Brown (1943); and (2) whether a binding agreement among multiple states, with both intra- and interstate effects, violates the Compact Clause, Article I, § 10, cl. 3 of the United States Constitution, in the absence of congressional approval. [read post]
