Search for: "C Lillie"
Results 141 - 160
of 441
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2017, 9:33 am
TSDR 5139183 LUNCH SOLUTIONS TSDR 5135758 HAPPIFEET TSDR 5139163 GREEK GIVING TSDR 5135723 CHANNELYZER TSDR 5138826 MAKE AMERICA CHRISTIAN AGAIN TSDR 5135648 SKYFINDER FUN RESILIENT INSPIRING NEW SUPER MEANINGFUL TSDR 5135512 C CORNERSTONE CONSTRUCTION “A SYMBOL OF STABILITY” TSDR 5135511 CORNERSTONE CONSTRUCTION A SYMBOL OF STABILITY TSDR 5138733 TSDR 5135465 DIGIWRAP TSDR 5138706 EZ GRIP TSDR 5138672 A PHARMACIST FOCUSED ON YOU TSDR 5138550 AMERICAN LANDMASTER TSDR 5138512… [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm
Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law Symposium Sorry, guys, I did not follow the patent panels.Panel III: Trademarks Rebecca Tushnet, Fixing Incontestability: The Next FrontierIncontestability is a nearly unique feature of American trademark law, with a unique American implementation. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Claire referred to the HGS v Lilly [2011] UKSC 51 and Actavis v Lilly [2015] EWHC 3294 (Pat) cases as examples of patents which did not have data in them and yet were found to be plausible. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:44 am
It was therefore said to lack utility under section 18(1)(c) of the Patents Act. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 4:53 am
Brian CorderyBristowsby Steven Willis Yesterday, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Idenix v Gilead [2016] EWCA Civ 1089, a dispute involving SOVALDI® (sofosbuvir), which is sold by Gilead as a treatment for chronic hepatitis C infection in adults. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 9:13 am
La inmensa mayoría, 75%, desconoce los cambios hechos al Código de Rentas Internas para incentivar la filantropía. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
” The rule “rewrites Title VII’s definition of ’similarly situated’ employees,” John C. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 8:33 am
Beware of the Lilly White. 88. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:00 am
| Actavis v Lilly | EU public consultation on neighbouring rights | Life as an IP Lawyer in San Francisco | Copyright in chess games | Trade surplus and IP | Fujifilm Kyowa Biologics v AbbVie Biotechnology. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 12:46 am
| Actavis v Lilly | EU public consultation on neighbouring rights | Life as an IP Lawyer in San Francisco | Copyright in chess games | Trade surplus and IP | Fujifilm Kyowa Biologics v AbbVie Biotechnology.Never too late 88 [week ending on Sunday 20 March] – CoA’s decision in Design & Display Limited v OOO Abbott & another | AG in McFadden C-484/14 on WiFi providers’ liability | Twitter on “Dronie”… [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 2:38 am
Advocate General delivers opinion in United Video Properties, Inc v Telenet NV, C-57/15. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
| Actavis v Lilly | EU public consultation on neighbouring rights | Life as an IP Lawyer in San Francisco | Copyright in chess games | Trade surplus and IP | Fujifilm Kyowa Biologics v AbbVie Biotechnology. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 2:59 am
* BREAKING: UK Supreme Court to hear Actavis v Lilly pemetrexed battleThe Supreme Court has just published its list of cases that it will be hearing (or not) on appeal. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:12 am
Advocate General Szpunar delivered his Opinion in the case pending before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) McFadden C-484/14. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
Other coverage relating to the politics of the nomination comes from: Ken Thomas and Kathleen Hennessey of the Associated Press, who report that, by “[c]hoosing a centrist judge with Republican appeal, President Barack Obama hoped to corner GOP opponents who pledge to block his Supreme Court pick” but “also boxed in the Democrats vying to succeed him”; Rebecca Savransky of The Hill, who reports that “Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders said… [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 1:25 pm
Difficulty may arise b/c of confidentiality clauses. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 11:43 am
Cir.2010) (quoting Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
* Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe caseThis is about the Court of Justice of the European Union's (CJEU) decision in Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v Adidas and OHIM [Case C‑396/15 P], another trade mark case upon parallel stripes and shoes. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
., C. [read post]
