Search for: "C Couch"
Results 141 - 160
of 404
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2017, 8:09 am
There wouldn’t be confusion about the source of the tangible good sold in the marketplace, because “[c]onsumers are not aware of the new, media-shifted digital files about which Plaintiff asserts confusion. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 6:28 am
EVID. 801(c)(2); United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:18 pm
They found Andrews seated on the couch in the living room with the cell phone in his pants pocket. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 6:30 am
Each chapter covers several decades and features events spanning from the early history of the United States through coverage of the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) of 2010.Professor Moreno discussed his book on C-SPAN. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 2:00 am
Photo by Devon C. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
It noted the “fundamental reason” for applying the “manifestly without reasonable foundation” test as given by the ECtHR Grand Chamber in Stec: that “[c]hoices about welfare systems involve policy decisions on economic and social matters which are pre-eminently matters for national authorities” (at [32]). [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 8:54 am
They sat on the couches there and discussed the address. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 2:00 pm
”). (...)Other cases, however, have couched the test in differentterms. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:23 am
When the victim left her bedroom, she saw defendant sleeping on the couch. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
“Most arguments being asserted now on discrimination against transgender individuals are couched as sex-stereotyping because the [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
A subpoena without such tailoring is `equally indefensible as a search warrant would be if couched in similar terms. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
The court begins the opinion by explaining thatThe defendant, Jonathan Bermudez, appeals from his convictions of trespass, in violation of [Massachusetts General Laws] c. 266, § 120, and larceny over $250, in violation of [Massachusetts General Laws] c. 266, § 30(1). [read post]
28 May 2016, 6:01 am
Luego la pregunta es: ¿Son los homosexuales intolerantes con aquellos a los que les importa un "panamito frito" -como al suscrito- que se comporten como les venga en gana, pero que se oponen férreamente a su incorporación a nuestro Código Civil conductas que no deberían siquiera debatirse? [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 10:43 am
This approach is a combination of Rules B and C. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 2:39 pm
And, most interestingly (maybe not, but it gives us a hook to transition to our case in a minute), C. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 11:15 am
Couch has come to grief. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 4:32 pm
The other highly significant case is Google Spain v AEPD and Mario Costeja Gonzalez [2014] C-131/12 which was handed down by the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Justice on 14 May 2014. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 7:35 pm
A charge of gross vehicular manslaughter under California Penal Code 192 (c) brings a maximum six years behind bars. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 7:34 pm
A charge of gross vehicular manslaughter under California Penal Code 192 (c) brings a maximum six years behind bars. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:50 am
Les entités n’ayant pas obtenu une approbation (c. [read post]
