Search for: "CERTAIN ECONOMIC LOSS PLAINTIFFS" Results 141 - 160 of 1,239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2017, 6:00 am by blackfin
Non-Economic Damages Non-economic damages are those that cover intangible costs endured by the plaintiff. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:00 am by blackfin
Non-Economic Damages Non-economic damages are those that cover intangible costs endured by the plaintiff. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:00 am by blackfin
Non-Economic Damages Non-economic damages are those that cover intangible costs endured by the plaintiff. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:00 am by blackfin
Non-Economic Damages Non-economic damages are those that cover intangible costs endured by the plaintiff. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:00 am by blackfin
Non-Economic Damages Non-economic damages are those that cover intangible costs endured by the plaintiff. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:00 am by blackfin
Non-Economic Damages Non-economic damages are those that cover intangible costs endured by the plaintiff. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:00 am by blackfin
Non-Economic Damages Non-economic damages are those that cover intangible costs endured by the plaintiff. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:00 am by blackfin
Non-Economic Damages Non-economic damages are those that cover intangible costs endured by the plaintiff. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:00 am by blackfin
Non-Economic Damages Non-economic damages are those that cover intangible costs endured by the plaintiff. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 2:43 am
  Finally, with respect to the authors’ suggestion that loss causation issues may prove critical, I note that in a prior post (here) I discussed the challenge that plaintiffs may face where they have sued for supposed economic losses on securities that continue to provide scheduled interest payments on time and in full. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 8:26 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Forklift Systems, a Supreme Court ruling from 1993, and in any event plaintiff can prove tangible harm even without economic loss under Title VII, which is not limited to economic or tangible discrimination. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:50 am by John Buford
  In a Middle District opinion Wednesday, the Court held that a foreign plaintiff may assert an unfair and deceptive trade practices claim in North Carolina under certain circumstances. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 10:13 am
But make no mistake, this January 10, 2014 decision is a huge victory for the plaintiffs seeking economic damages to their businesses as a result of the oil spill. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:00 am by Judy Selby
The Court found that the plaintiffs failed to carry the day under this statute, again due to their failure to adequately plead economic injury. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 10:57 am by Stephen Bilkis
New York’s No-Fault Insurance Law precludes recovery for any “noneconomic loss, except in the case of serious injury, or for basic economic loss” arising out of the negligent use or operation of a motor vehicle. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 1:17 pm by Bexis
A named plaintiff must allege facts showing that he or she personally suffered economic loss as a result of an inadequate recall to state a cognizable injury.Id. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 1:17 pm by Bexis
A named plaintiff must allege facts showing that he or she personally suffered economic loss as a result of an inadequate recall to state a cognizable injury.Id. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 10:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” For a plaintiff to recover, she must show that she “suffered [ascertainable] pecuniary loss. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 9:53 am
Florida UM (uninsured/underinsured motororst) insurance coverage, contained in F.S. 627.727, is first party insurance to compensate insureds for economic losses (e.g., medical expenses and lost wages) and non-economic damages (e.g., pain & suffering) resulting from motor vehicle accidents. [read post]