Search for: "Carter v. United States Department of Justice" Results 141 - 160 of 215
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2015, 7:22 am
The United States Department of Justice states that DNA is a "powerful criminal justice tool. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:46 am by Darien Shanske
Tax systems treat taxpayers differently all the time, and the central question before the Court in Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 11:01 am by Benjamin Bissell
Last year, Carter wrote an article in DefenseOne that outlined his plans for the Pentagon, which you can find here. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:05 am by Diane Marie Amann
Smith, International Criminal Justice Director/Legal Counsel, No Peace Without Justice, Brussels, Belgium; Professor Jonathan Todres, Georgia State University School of Law, Atlanta; and Yayoi Yamaguchi, Associate Legal Advisor, Legal Advisory Section, ICC Office of the Prosecutor. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am by Schachtman
Carter is hard to square with commentators and precedent and the logic of the law. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 7:28 pm by Stephen Wermiel
The Justices have long had a seemingly contentious relationship with the Ninth Circuit, which covers most of the western United States and Hawaii and Alaska. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm by Amy Howe
  In its brief in Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:37 am by The Book Review Editor
It was Arzú who had just persuaded the United Nations to take Guatemala off its blacklist. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
To take just one example, while TCRR cites Alexander Polikoff’s Waiting for Gautreaux for the fact that 65 of the 75 staff attorneys in the Civil Rights Division protested the Justice Department’s change of position in Alexander v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
To take just one example, while TCRR cites Alexander Polikoff’s Waiting for Gautreaux for the fact that 65 of the 75 staff attorneys in the Civil Rights Division protested the Justice Department’s change of position in Alexander v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 10:53 am by Ronald Mann
(represented by Carter Phillips), because the Justices all agreed in Bilski that there is a category of idea that is so abstract that a patent claiming the idea cannot issue. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:35 am by Lyle Denniston
Carter, on filing deadlines for claims of fraud against the government; 13-43, Maersk Drilling USA v. [read post]