Search for: "Company X,Y&Z" Results 141 - 160 of 238
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 pm by Jonathan Brun
Many software advertisements, such as this one by Intelex target top level managers who think they need X, Y, Z, without consulting their staff first. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:42 am by Daniel Shaviro
 If I am proposing that the taxation of multinational companies' income by a given country should follow approaches A, B, and C, rather than X, Y, and Z, then I am in the normative realm, and a convincing descriptive explanation of why we in fact have corporate and international taxation would not be on point for the normative question, though perhaps illuminating it indirectly - for example, in terms of the set of feasible policies.Before I turn to the… [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 8:01 am by Jason Shinn
Or consider what happens if the company is in the business of "X" when the noncompete agreement is entered into but later expands into "Y" and "Z" business? [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 5:17 am by Jon Hyman
Think Before You Click: Strategies for Managing Social Media in the Workplace — Midwest Labor & Employment Law Conference (October 4) X+Y+Z = A Generational Mess for Your Workplace Policies — 2013 COSE Small Business Convention (October 24) New NLRB Requirements — NBI Teleconference (November 1)As always, you can find all of my past and future speaking gigs by clicking on the Speaking Engagements tab at the top of the page. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 5:17 am by Jon Hyman
Think Before You Click: Strategies for Managing Social Media in the Workplace — Midwest Labor & Employment Law Conference (October 4) X+Y+Z = A Generational Mess for Your Workplace Policies — 2013 COSE Small Business Convention (October 24) New NLRB Requirements — NBI Teleconference (November 1)As always, you can find all of my past and future speaking gigs by clicking on the Speaking Engagements tab at the top of the page. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 2:00 am
Data Analytics What most clients ultimately want to know is that a patent litigation will cost $X through the Markman hearing or that an acquisition will cost $Y for Due Diligence, and $Z to close the deal. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:47 am by Carrie Cordero
 If the adversary knows that we collect X type of data, and that we collect it when it travels through X service provider, and that we collect it in Y or Z format, and that we collect certain information pursuant to a Court order which requires a certain legal standard, then the adversary has the information, and therefore power, to adapt their own techniques and tradecraft to beat us. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 1:40 pm by Schachtman
A Gedanken Experiment An expert witness writes a report that X, a drug therapy, causes Y, a benefit in survival, for a disease, Z. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 5:20 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
(Image credit: Getty Images via @daylife) Z is for Zombie Debt. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 8:15 am by Peter Fleischer
 Companies have to disclose X, Y, and Z, or they'll risk regulatory sanctions. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 12:07 pm by Florian Mueller
If Google owns X number of patents, there are Y number of other patents declared essential to the same standard and outside that standard the product may need a license to Z number of patents (some reading on other standards, some being non-SEPs), it may appear to be a Herculean task to collect the evidence and develop the theories for which a 2.25%-of-full-product-price royalty demand is outside the FRAND ballpark -- even though it wouldn't take a reasonable,… [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 6:31 am
Understanding these factors can be complicated because instead of looking at a need as a monthly amount we have a tendency to think through our bills and say, "You pay x, y and z bills." [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 6:31 am
Understanding these factors can be complicated because instead of looking at a need as a monthly amount we have a tendency to think through our bills and say, "You pay x, y and z bills. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 2:01 pm by Bexis
  That means that X (or someone claiming through X), who was allegedly injured by Y, cannot sue Z, who is Y’s liability insurer.Well, now it appears that there may be an exception – if the injured person also happens to be a Medicare beneficiary. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:53 am by D. Daxton White
According to their website the company has over 30 years experience investing in the oil and gas industry. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 6:26 am by Florian Mueller
The above paragraph basically says: there's a FRAND range from $x (low end) to $y (high end), and for every dollar and cent in excess of $y, you had better come up with a really good excuse that you demanded this differential of $z without knowing that you were outside the permissible range -- and absent a sufficient excuse, you've committed a breach.Further below, that paragraph clarifies that FRAND royalties "must be equally available to all" regardless of… [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:28 pm by Michael Risch
They claim "The steps of making A happen by doing X, Y, and Z. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 8:58 am by Dan Harris
 One lawyer was saying it said “X”, another said it said “Y”, and I said it said “Z”. [read post]