Search for: "Cotton v. Grounds" Results 141 - 160 of 161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
According to EPA officials, PCBs were improperly disposed when PCB transformer oil from two transformers on the UB campus spilled or leaked onto concrete pads and the nearby ground. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:03 pm by MacIsaac
Cotton (1995) 10 B.C.L.R. (3d) 73 (C.A.) at para. 25; and Campbell v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 2:58 am
John Cotton of Cotton Law Offices, Gillette, Wyoming; and Kenneth E. [read post]
23 Dec 2006, 10:50 am
AT&T Cotton Bowl Classic Cotton BowlCotton Bowl, Dallas, Texas - Monday, January 1, 2007, 11:30 a.m. [read post]
29 Sep 2004, 12:28 pm
Washington, 124 S.Ct. 2531 (2004).Moving on to the Blakely claim, The day before oral argument, Appellant filed a letter pursuant to Local Rule 28(j) arguing that the sentence was unlawful on the ground that Blakely v. [read post]