Search for: "D & R General Contracting, LLC" Results 141 - 160 of 668
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
Magee decision which, drawing upon that court’s 2002 ruling in the Blue Chip Emerald case, enforced the purchasing LLC member’s fiduciary duty of disclosure of an impending third-party buyout notwithstanding a general release given by the selling members. [read post]
The defendant also argued that Weight was based on a strict presumption against removal, which conflicted with the Supreme Court’s clarification in Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 10:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Universal City Studios LLC, No. 1:14–CV–00528, 2014 WL 7240526 (N.D. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm by Kelly
SONY/ATV Publishing LLC (Copyright Litigation Blog) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Koons, Jeff – Artists Jeff Koons sends cease and desist notices to Park Life and Imm-Living  (IP Factor) Schrock – Contract claims sound in copyright: Schrock v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The 2007-2011 CBA's article 50 contained a merger clause, stating that the CBA was "the entire agreement between the State and CSEA, terminate[d] all prior agreements and understandings and conclude[d] all collective negotiations during its term. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The 2007-2011 CBA's article 50 contained a merger clause, stating that the CBA was "the entire agreement between the State and CSEA, terminate[d] all prior agreements and understandings and conclude[d] all collective negotiations during its term. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Delaware alternative entity law (e.g., LLCs) does not make indemnification mandatory under any circumstances. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 3:05 pm by Anthony Zaller
Border Transportation Group, LLC, analyzes the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 1:48 pm by Matthew C. Bouchard, Esq.
A full exploration of the facts, holding, dissent and practical implications of the John Conner Construction decision follows: FACTS: John Conner Construction, R&G Construction Co. and Eggers Construction Co. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 8:03 am
It rendered a general judgment in favor of Springhurst stating that "the court found the plaintiff proved the defendant liable pursuant to contract and Indiana case law for the sum of $2,610.87" but declined to specify further facts or law in support of the judgment. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
General Foam Plastics Corp (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court Kansas: Third Party infringers have no standing to challenge assignment: KMMentor, LLC v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
(IPblog)   US General – Decisions District Court E D Wisconsin: Can a trade secret licensee state a claim? [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:40 pm by John Lewis
Defendants Actavis LLC and related entities (“Actavis”) and Shire together produce Intuniv’s generic counterpart. [read post]