Search for: "DAVIS v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION" Results 141 - 156 of 156
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
But because federal law requires that generic manufacturers use verbatim the labeling initially prepared by the inventor of the drug - here, Wyeth - plaintiff got a second bite at the apple against Wyeth, even though she indisputably never used Wyeth's drug, and Wyeth no longer even manufactured it. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 1:37 am
The conclusion in Research Corporation Technologies [RCT] v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
It is a relic of the earliest days of penology, when slavery, branding, and other corporal punishments were commonplace. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 3:13 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce in 1990, Alito has now led a majority to condemn in dispassionate terms in Davis v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
FEC (2004) -- campaign finance (especially corporate PAC requirement)Groh v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:44 am
I expect we will continue to see the courts express skepticism about expansive standing under the Lanham Act, especially where the plaintiffs are corporate customers or suppliers. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
Finally, we are compelled to express our concern with the advocacy on behalf of the State in this matter. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:26 am
Schwartz, a law professor at Touro College, writes that the decision in Paul v. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 11:59 pm
Davies, 39, had previously been the Hong Kong-based Asia managing partner for the 2,300-lawyer British firm, one of London's Magic Circle of five leading corporate law firms. N.Y. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:25 pm
Conway Express, Inc., 261 Ga. 41 (1991); Georgia Power Co. v. [read post]