Search for: "De Carter"
Results 141 - 160
of 654
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2020, 10:20 am
According to the complaint, Mr. de Becker soon concluded that “Mr. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 2:11 pm
Twelve contain a de minimis restriction, such as a requirement that an agency head certifies the necessity of the measure (something the president can presumably order the agency head to do). [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 11:21 am
En principe, la mise en œuvre d’une telle demande peut exposer à des pénalités de retard, mais le contexte particulier dans lequel la demande est faite pourrait conduire l’Etat à écarter ces pénalités. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 5:43 pm
The Appellants’ case is that Jay J applied the law on section 4 as stated by Warby J in Economou v de Frietas [2017] EMLR 4 (a judgment upheld by the Court of Appeal) and reached a non-perverse conclusion that the defence should succeed, and therefore the Court of Appeal was not entitled to substitute its preferred outcome. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:14 pm
Nick points out that the data is only pseudonymized and tries with mixed success to teach me to say “de-pseudonymized. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 3:40 pm
Nick points out that the data is only pseudonymized and tries with mixed success to teach me to say "de-pseudonymized. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Le libellé de cette disposition a suscité bien des débats au chapitre de l’élément de faute requis. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
Ni son libellé, ni son objectif, ni son contexte n’indiquent que le législateur entendait s’écarter du régime général de la prescription. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 3:00 am
The order by Barr comes after a critical report by the inspector general showed how FBI agents did not follow protocols and falsified information in their bid to investigate Carter Page, a former Trump campaign associate. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
[2] Légalisée par le Parlement dans la foulée de l’arrêt Carter[1] rendu par la Cour suprême en 2015, l’aide médicale à mourir est strictement encadrée au pays[2]. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
Mishcon de Reya Data Matters had a post “Children’s data protection rights: a data protection casualty? [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:25 pm
(IOA DE Nomination.)Past recipients of this award have included:Vicky Brown, University of Central Florida John Carter, The Citadel Ingrid Clarke, Southern Illinois University Claudia D'Albini, University of Arizona Wendy Friede, American ExpressHoward Gadlin, National Institutes of Health Tim Griffin, Northern Illinois University Helen Hasenfeld, California Institute of Technology Wilbur Hicks, International Monetary Fund Wendell Jones,… [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
DEAR FRIENDS: The bloggers here at the 1709 Blog have decided that this will be our very last post. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 7:04 pm
Tabitha Carter, No. 116,223 (Sedgwick)Direct appeal (petition for review); Agg robberyJennifer C. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 6:55 am
En effet, les juges ont pris en compte l’attitude de la subordonnée pour écarter le harcèlement sexuel. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:28 am
CARTER DEVELOPMENT OF MASSACHUSETTS, LLC, Appellant, v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:57 am
But Boumendil has now more recently appealed this decision and is seeking damages for the alleged unlicensed use of this jingle, and a breach of the contract between the parties.Jay-Z sues Australian retailer over lyricsAmerican rapper Jay-Z (Shawn Carter) has filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against Australian Jessica Chiha and her business “The Little Homie”, which sells hip-hop inspired clothing and apparel. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:23 am
In 1978, the Carter administration categorically concluded that Israel’s establishment of civilian settlements was inconsistent with international law. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 9:02 pm
Because many of its peers have taken a less aggressive approach to the taxation of international income, and no other state has adopted a remote sales tax regime without a de minimis threshold, Kansas dropped seven places on the Index overall, from 27th to 34th. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:54 pm
Elle souligne qu’il est déraisonnable de conclure que les pouvoirs d’enquête dévolus au TAT lui permettent d’écarter cette immunité de communication de la preuve et précise que sa loi constituante[3] ne contient pas de termes suffisamment « clairs, explicites et non équivoques pour écarter le privilège relatif au litige »[4]. [read post]
