Search for: "Distributed Solutions, Inc. v. US" Results 141 - 160 of 485
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2018, 12:35 am
Accordingly, again, the Office again fails to consider the synergy of the claim combination, and incorrectly states that the ordered combination adds nothing.Citing to the holding in Bascom Global Internet Services, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 8:10 am by Steven Boranian
We all know that failure-to-warn and design defect claims against generic drug manufacturers are preempted, thanks to PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:28 pm
(Content Agenda) MPAA effectively shuts down largest fan edit movie site (Techdirt) Final judgment: SCO owes Novell millions (plus interest) (Ars Technica) Coupons, Inc drops DMCA lawsuit against coupon hacker (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) McCain responds to Jackson Browne lawsuit (Techdirt) Judge quashes subpoenas where Boston University could not identify John Does ‘to reasonable degree of technical certainty: London Sire Records v Does 1-4 (Recording Industry vs The… [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
(China Law Insight) USPTO launches patent quality improvement initiative (The 271 Patent Blog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC uses KSR’s ‘common sense’ test to affirm invalidity: Perfect Web Technologies Inc v InfoUSA Inc (Inventive Step) CAFC reverses decision: is there any limit left on declaratory judgment jurisdiction? [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am by Kristian Soltes
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 6:42 am
The Board found that these combined features are “essential to the use or purpose of the article or affect[] the cost or quality of the article," Inwood Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 4:15 am
Thus the City's action in discarding the tests was a violation of Title VII.By way of background, the Supreme Court noted that the City had employed an outside, independent entity, Industrial/Organizational Solutions, Inc. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:27 am by WIMS
On American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
It is an issue for which there is not yet a definitive solution, which is creating potential issues for rights holders, NFT issuers and NFT owners. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:17 pm
Thus the City’s action in discarding the tests was a violation of Title VII.By way of background, the Supreme Court noted that the City had employed an outside, independent entity, Industrial/Organizational Solutions, Inc. [read post]