Search for: "Doe Entities" Results 141 - 160 of 34,894
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2019, 4:24 pm by Francis Pileggi
Important Legal Principles Recited by the Court: This opinion is noteworthy for the many important statements of law it recites regarding the prerequisites for a properly functioning special litigation committee, not only in the corporate context, but–more importantly–in the less often addressed alternative entity context which does not enjoy as robust a body of case law compared to the corporate context on this issue. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:14 am by cching
The law also prohibits entities receiving referrals from billing for any such items or services provided. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 12:12 pm by Thomas Kerner
  Whereas the law does not allow a judgment creditor to do the same with a person's membership interest in an LLC. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 12:12 pm by Thomas Kerner
  Whereas the law does not allow a judgment creditor to do the same with a person's membership interest in an LLC. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 12:26 pm
A number of entities have filed comments with the U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 10:23 am by Hoffman & Hoffman
The personal representative’s role is to administer the […] The post Understanding the Probate Process: How Does it Work? [read post]
31 May 2011, 10:33 am by Matthew Lavrinets
  Although this case does not present a significant change in the law, it is an important reminder that claimants probably comply with the claims presentation requirement when they present their claims to local public entities' risk management and/or legal departments. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:57 pm by Pamela Avraham
A sole proprietorship does not limit liability, but insurance may be purchased. [read post]
30 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In what is being touted as a significant win for pharmaceutical drug manufacturers, the DC Circuit affirmed on May 21, 2024 that Section 340B of the Public Health Service Act does not categorically prohibit manufacturers from imposing distribution restrictions on covered drugs to covered entities. [read post]
30 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In what is being touted as a significant win for pharmaceutical drug manufacturers, the DC Circuit affirmed on May 21, 2024 that Section 340B of the Public Health Service Act does not categorically prohibit manufacturers from imposing distribution restrictions on covered drugs to covered entities. [read post]
30 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In what is being touted as a significant win for pharmaceutical drug manufacturers, the DC Circuit affirmed on May 21, 2024 that Section 340B of the Public Health Service Act does not categorically prohibit manufacturers from imposing distribution restrictions on covered drugs to covered entities. [read post]
30 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In what is being touted as a significant win for pharmaceutical drug manufacturers, the DC Circuit affirmed on May 21, 2024 that Section 340B of the Public Health Service Act does not categorically prohibit manufacturers from imposing distribution restrictions on covered drugs to covered entities. [read post]
30 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In what is being touted as a significant win for pharmaceutical drug manufacturers, the DC Circuit affirmed on May 21, 2024 that Section 340B of the Public Health Service Act does not categorically prohibit manufacturers from imposing distribution restrictions on covered drugs to covered entities. [read post]
30 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In what is being touted as a significant win for pharmaceutical drug manufacturers, the DC Circuit affirmed on May 21, 2024 that Section 340B of the Public Health Service Act does not categorically prohibit manufacturers from imposing distribution restrictions on covered drugs to covered entities. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 5:16 am
Brian Woodford is still at large although he does have a LinkedIn Profile up which indicates that he’s interested in “getting back in touch. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 6:00 pm by Dennis Crouch
Non practicing entities (NPEs) are a familiar part of the IP landscape in Europe, just as they are in the US. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:28 pm by Wahab & Medenica LLC
Be aware that this reluctance alone does not mean an alternate structure is not viable and/or desirable. 4. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm by Brendan Kevenides
The statute does not appear to have the purpose to relieve public entities from liability for injuries caused by structures erected on the exempted roads. [read post]