Search for: "ERICSSON, INC. "
Results 141 - 160
of 252
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
Even where it does apply (such as Samsung's current situation in a two-front war with Apple and Ericsson), it's a partial solution at best.I have a more fundamental problem -- actually, not just one problem -- with the belief that the "repeated game" setting keeps companies honest. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 9:33 am
Refused, 3(k) V Saravanan 4050/CHENP/2007 E2INTERACTIVE INC. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
19 May 2013, 1:06 am
As an interim arrangement, Micromax agreed to pay Ericsson 1.25% to 2% on the sale price as royalty to Ericsson, an incredibly high rate as Prashant pointed out earlier over here. [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/5cUgbQBWtB -> Netflix Says It’s ‘Killing’ BitTorrent Traffic http://t.co/VdhC2zWj9M -> Craigslist, Inc. v. 3Taps INC., Dist. [read post]
8 May 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/5cUgbQBWtB -> Netflix Says It’s ‘Killing’ BitTorrent Traffic http://t.co/VdhC2zWj9M -> Craigslist, Inc. v. 3Taps INC., Dist. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 5:29 pm
IPNews® - The pending patent war between Ericsson Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 2:48 am
Recent Patent Deals from the USPTO Assignment Records: Ericsson transferred over 820 patent families to the publicly traded company known as Unwired Planet, Inc. [read post]
Apple filing reveals Samsung recently reduced its 2.4% royalty demand for standard-essential patents
5 Apr 2013, 10:17 am
Complaint, Ericsson Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:33 am
The week saw Ericsson, the Swedish giant in mobile network infrastructure manufacturing filing a patent infringement suit against Micromax, one of India’s largest domestic mobile handset manufacturers. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 4:38 pm
The engagement relates to a US action by Samsung against Ericsson in the ITC. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:45 pm
Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America LLC". [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm
As a litigation watcher I see the threat to consumer interests that mutual SEP-based injunction requests such as in the Ericsson-Samsung dispute pose, and how unbelievably far-fetched the theories of some litigants are if they believe they have a benefit from alleging that a patent they have to defend themselves against is standard-essential, which would also happen if someone wants to invoke the "defensive use" clause in order to respond to non-SEP litigation with SEP-based retaliatory… [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
STMicroelectronics Inc., NPEs often file law suits first and then attempt to negotiate a license with the accused infringer/defendant. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 1:00 pm
LM Ericsson Telephone Co., No. 11-4574 (E.D. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:00 pm
Viasystems partially reimbursed Ericsson and, in turn, made demand on St. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:00 pm
Viasystems partially reimbursed Ericsson and, in turn, made demand on St. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 6:28 am
In addition to the motions to dismiss, Air2Web Inc., Ericsson Inc., Sybase Inc., SoundBite Communications Inc., Syniverse Technologies LLC, Vibes Media LLC and 3Cinteractive LLC, asked the Court to stay the case to permit the dispute to be arbitrated pursuant to an agreement to arbitrate. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:58 am
Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., C.A. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:52 am
Sony-Ericsson Mobile Comms. [read post]
