Search for: "EUGENE R. SULLIVAN"
Results 141 - 160
of 198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2012, 8:33 am
(Eugene Volokh) From The Stroppy Editor: The very model of an amateur grammarian (With apologies to Gilbert and Sullivan) I am the very model of an amateur grammarian I have a little knowledge and I am authoritarian But I make no apology for being doctrinarian We must not plummet to the verbal depths of the barbarian I’d sooner break my heart in two than sunder an infinitive And I’d disown my closest family within a minute if They dared to place a preposition at a… [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm
(Eugene Volokh) This tort — straight out of Gilbert & Sullivan — turns out to remains theoretically alive in a few states, though apparently very rarely litigated. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:24 am
Sullivan (1991)); but that power of the government to control its own speech is far removed from the government’s attempt in this case to retaliate against businesses for their owners’ speech. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 5:48 am
Eugene M. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So reports the L.A. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 10:53 am
(Eugene Volokh) AllahPundit (Hot Air), Andrew Sullivan, and Dan Murphy (Christian Science Monitor) question whether a bill allowing people to have sex with their dead spouses (for up to six hours after the death) was indeed proposed in the Egyptian Parliament. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:47 pm
Sullivan (1964). [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:07 pm
Eugene R. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:36 pm
(Eugene Volokh) In today’s United States v. [read post]
TEN YEARS AGO ON INSTAPUNDIT: “Andrew Sullivan has spent the last few days exploring the New York T…
17 Jan 2012, 8:13 pm
Believe it or not, some law professors on the list are actually suggesting that it would be a good idea if people with handgun carry licenses carried guns at school.” And Eugene Volokh on heroism at Appalachian Law. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 8:11 pm
What a wonder to see people like Andrew Sullivan, Josh Marshall and David Brooks taken seriously. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm
Sullivan, and the Jehovah’s Witness pamphleteers in Lovell v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 3:26 pm
” Massachusetts Attorney General James Sullivan (1801) similarly treated “the freedom of speech” as referring to “utter[ing], in words spoken,” and “the freedom of the press” as referring to “print[ing] and publish[ing]. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:40 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Novotny v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
The question I’ve been asking in a series of recent posts is whether history can provide any insight into current claims that copyright law and the First Amendment conflict. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964). [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Sullivan on this point). [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Sullivan on this point). [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:13 am
(Eugene Volokh) One other possible approach is to view knowing falsehoods as “low-value” speech, so that restrictions on the speech are judged under intermediate scrutiny rather than strict scrutiny. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:13 am
(Eugene Volokh) One other possible approach is to view knowing falsehoods as “low-value” speech, so that restrictions on the speech are judged under intermediate scrutiny rather than strict scrutiny. [read post]
