Search for: "Electronics For Imaging, Inc. " Results 141 - 160 of 1,168
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2019, 12:45 pm by Jonathan Bailey
CSC Holdings, Inc, often referred to as the Cablevision case. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:42 am by Francis Pileggi
See, e.g., footnote 72 (citing a Court of Chancery Order allowing for imaging of a Blackberry in a Section 220 case.) [read post]
  IoT-connected and voice-activated electronic devices and toys have caught the agency’s attention in the last several years. [read post]
  IoT-connected and voice-activated electronic devices and toys have caught the agency’s attention in the last several years. [read post]
6 May 2019, 5:44 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Under a new OCR Resolution Agreement and Corrective Action Plan announced May 6, 2019, Touchstone Medical Imaging (“Touchstone”) must pay $3,000,000 to OCR and adopt a corrective action plan to settle OCR charges it violated HIPAA arising from an OCR investigation of Touchstone’s handling of a 2014 breach. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet, Harvard Law School, On PufferyPuffery is a concept that purports to be about things consumers ignore and don’t rely on. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 7:09 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Rebarchak reviewed all of the statements sent by PNC but did not see the electronic check copies because Ostojic intercepted the online statements and removed the check images before he could see them. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
[u]sing the Internet ... for the purpose of posting ... electronically written words, images and/or videos which threaten, harass or defame and/or slander the other spouse .... [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, the rules of one Ohio court categorically call for such injunctions in divorce cases: In all cases, upon the filing of the initial Complaint for divorce, annulment or legal separation, both spouses shall be restrained from … [u]sing the Internet … for the purpose of posting … electronically written words, images and/or videos which threaten, harass or defame and/or slander the other spouse …. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:00 am by Edward Baker
The decision is also significant because it makes clear that a decedent’s digital images, as opposed to electronic communications, do not require proof of a deceased user’s consent before his or her fiduciary may access them. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 12:00 am
These are just some of the compelling arguments [seriously] that the fifth chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Communities considered in this case between Apple and Pear Industries.BackgroundBack in 2014 on the 25th July, Pear Technologies Ltd filed an application for the figurative mark shown right, for an EU trade mark in Classes 9, 35, and 42, which included the following:Class 9: ‘Personal computers; laptop computers; handset and tablet mobile digital electronic… [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 2:21 pm by Patricia Hughes
He was charged with voyeurism under section 162(1)(c) of the Criminal Code: s.162(1) Every one commits an offence who, surreptitiously, observes — including by mechanical or electronic means — or makes a visual recording of a person who is in circumstances that give rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy, if … (c) the observation or recoding is done for a sexual purpose. [read post]