Search for: "Eli Lilly and Company "
Results 141 - 160
of 1,165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2019, 1:34 pm
Judges in the Indiana Court of Appeals issued their Opinion in the case of Neptune Generics, LLC, and Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC (collectively “Petitioners”) versus Eli Lilly and Company. [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:42 am
” Witnesses at the hearing included Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Cigna’s Express Scripts, United Healthcare’s Optum, and CVS. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:29 am
This focused on the three-step test of the Eli Lilly v Actavis UK Supreme Court decision and the subsequent UK cases applying that test. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 12:32 am
Eli Lilly. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 10:48 am
And the same is true with General Motors, Chevron, IBM and Eli Lilly. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:00 am
Eli Lilly claims that it is the assignee of the ‘209 patent, a method patent which was upheld as valid by the Federal Circuit in, Eli Lilly and Company v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:06 am
Indianapolis, IN – Richard Bell of McCordsville, Indiana filed three separate copyright infringement suits against Subud Greater Seattle (“Subud”), Eli Lilly and Company (“Lilly”), and Quickbook Modeling Agency (“Quickbook”). [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 2:23 am
Richard Bell’s internet-scouring spiders have apparently found another batch of entities that used his Indianapolis skyline photograph, including a big name, Eli Lilly and Company. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
The event blurb reads:"Jurisdictional issues have increasingly come to the fore in IP disputes in recent years, from Lucasfilm v Ainsworth and Actavis v Eli Lilly to FRAND disputes such as Unwired Planet v Huawei, Apple v Qualcommand Conversant v Huawei & ZTE, as parties clash on forum-shopping and attempts to reach one-stop resolution of their IP disputes. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 119 F.3d 1559, 1564–65 (Fed. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 2:26 pm
Finally, there was an analysis of the recent decision of the District Court of The Hague that the Dutch part of Eli Lilly and Company's patent EP 1 313 508 is valid. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 12:47 am
Joost DuijmOn 16 January 2019, the District Court of The Hague ruled that the Dutch part of Eli Lilly and Company’s patent EP 1 313 508 is valid. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 3:45 am
Bart van WezenbeekRelevant prior art may prove not to be useful as a starting point for an attack on inventive step if the prior art teaching is negated by later studies before the effective date of the patent claims. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 1:19 am
Based on the Pemetrexed-decision of the German Federal Supreme Court (docket-no X ZR 29/15, also known as Actavis v Eli Lilly), the Court of Appeal made it clear that Swiss-type claims are to be treated in the same way as so-called EPC 2000-claims. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 12:00 am
Sources[1] Eli Lilly and Company. (2019, January 7). [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:50 am
First panel discussion: Pros and Cons of Different Patent Litigation Systems in Europe The first panel was composed of Ivan Burnside (Eli Lilly), George Moore (Mylan) and Clemens Heusch (Nokia) giving their personal in-house counsel perspectives on different patent litigation systems based on their experience with parallel cases in many European jurisdictions.One of the key points to emerge from this discussion was that judges must be educated by appropriate experts in the… [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
According to the study, they include GE, Intel, Pfizer, Allstate, Medtronic, Eli Lilly, Southwest Airlnes, AEP, Ingersoll Rand, Praxair, Entergy, Clorox, NiSource & Dentsply Sirona. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 12:04 pm
We begin this week with an update on the pemetrexed (Alimta) Italian patent case between Fresenius Kabi and Eli Lilly.Pemetrexed disodium at the Court of MilanLast year, IPKat blogged about the Court of Milan's decision in the pemetrexed (Alimta) patent case (Court of Milan, 12 September 2017, urgent proceedings between Fresenius Kabi and Eli Lilly).That decision has now been fully reversed by a panel of three judges of the same Court of… [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 4:28 pm
Uruguay, Eli Lilly v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:39 am
In her comment Lord Kitchin applies the "markedly different" infringement approach in Actavis v Eli Lilly in Icescape v Ice-World, InternKat Rose analyses this recent case to determine whether Lord Kitchin approached any of the unresolved issues left in the Actavis v Eli Lilly case.CopyrightLast year The IPKat reported on two new important referrals to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) from Germany. [read post]
