Search for: "Eric Primas"
Results 141 - 160
of 189
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2010, 10:01 am
We have a lot of ambiguity about being part of the prima facie case/defenses. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am
Hosted by Graeme Dinwoodie (DePaul/Oxford) & Mark Janis (Indiana) Session 1: Permissible Uses of Marks: Rationales and Sources of Law. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:01 am
By Eric Goldman Harris v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 10:18 am
Intellectual Property Group This blog is written by Michael Graif, Andrew Seiden, Jacques Semmelman and Eric Stenshoel, four intellectual property lawyers in Curtis's New York office. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 10:18 am
Intellectual Property Group This blog is written by Michael Graif, Andrew Seiden, Jacques Semmelman and Eric Stenshoel, four intellectual property lawyers in Curtis's New York office. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm
By Eric Goldman Xcentric Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 6:33 am
Department of Labor Announces (Again) Increased Wage and Hour Enforcement - via Eric Welter's Laconic Law Blog. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 1:57 pm
By Eric Goldman Jones v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 11:15 am
By Eric Goldman My system of managing news items that don't warrant a full blog post but can't fit into a 140 character Twitter post has broken down. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:55 pm
By Eric Goldman Last week's release of the FTC's new Endorsement and Testimonial Guidelines has generated a significant amount of angst online. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 11:04 am
This situation is prima facie preempted by 47 USC 230. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 9:16 am
We do not need incompetent prima donnas in public service. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 7:21 am
The Prima Facie Law Blog has a great refresher (primer?) [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 9:00 pm
If a prima facie case of harm is advanced, the court must determine the harm issue. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 12:57 pm
By Eric Goldman Barnes v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 9:08 pm
In that case, we affirmed dismissal according to the Reynolds evidentiary framework because, after the privilege had been asserted with respect to evidence during discovery, we concluded that “the state secrets privilege bars the plaintiff from establishing her prima facie case on any of her eleven claims,” and that “[n]o protective procedure can salvage [the plaintiff]’s suit. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:06 am
ERIC S. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 11:35 am
By Eric Goldman Blogs and Boards * WSJ: Bloggers, Beware: What You Write Can Get You Sued * j2 Global Communications v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 4:27 pm
By Eric Goldman Solid Host, NL v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:16 pm
By Eric Goldman I've already blogged a couple times on the Ninth Circuit's Barnes v. [read post]
