Search for: "Exxon Mobile Corp" Results 141 - 160 of 380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Exxon Mobil Corp., a federal district judge in New Jersey concluded that federal courts lack subject matter jurisdiction to enforce preliminary orders to reinstate former employees under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”). [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 7:34 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
By contrast, the majority of Mobil and ExxonMobil Corp’s public communications promoted doubt on the matter. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:40 pm
Exxon Mobil Corp., 2007-2371 (La. 7/1/08); ____ So. 2d ____. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:01 am by Joy Waltemath
The tort claims against Exxon failed because having contractual substance abuse program requirements for the plaintiff’s employer did not establish the requisite control over the third-party drug screening company, nor was it evidence of tortious inference (Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 9:34 am
Commentary If the Supreme Court voted immediately in the huge oil spill case heard on Wednesday, and voted the sentiments the Justices expressed throughout 90 minutes of oral argument, this might well be the outcome: Exxon Mobil Corp. and its shipping subsidiary may well have to pay some punitive damages, but not $2.5 billion. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 3:19 pm by WSLL
Summary of Decision issued November 12, 2009 Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:38 pm
The BP-Martek partnership announcement comes on the heels of Exxon Mobil Corp.'s July 14, 2009 announcement of a $600 million investment in next-generation algae-based biofuels in partnership with privately held Synthetic Genomics Inc., with the possibility of significantly more investment to follow in order to scale up the technology and bring it to commercial production. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 12:05 pm
A comment on WaPo's "Why we wrote about the Koch Industries and its leases in Canada’s oil sands," which responds to Power Line's "Washington Post Falls for Left-Wing Fraud, Embarrasses Itself," which referred to a WaPo article by Steve Mufson and Juliet Eilperin titled (apparently falsely) "The biggest lease holder in Canada’s oil sands isn’t Exxon Mobil or Chevron. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by Don Cruse
In a class certification appeal, the Court speaks to the UCC's good-faith requirement Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]