Search for: "G.D."
Results 141 - 160
of 160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
G.D. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:10 am
G.D. 08-014817 (2008) and by Judge R. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
G.D. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
We received a copy of Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
We received a copy of Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:02 pm
This article was originally published by Bloomberg Law. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
This, that, and the other thing.Potpourri.Odds and sods.Whatever. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm
Today’s post is of the “this and that” variety ? [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:23 am
Both aggregation and disaggregation of outcomes poses difficult problems for statistical analysis, and for epidemiology. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
We’ve covered a lot of topics since we started DDLaw in late 2006. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
We’ve already discussed the peculiar decision in Watts v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
G.D. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
We would all go down together!! [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
We took a look at a case called Birdsong v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Ok, we've worried about what might happen if our side (the defense, for any new readers) were to lose the preemption wars currently in progress before the Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm
JOpinion Editor’s note: Gary M. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
