Search for: "G.L. " Results 141 - 160 of 545
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Heidi A. Nadel
2016 was another big year in anti-SLAPP litigation – with the Appeals Court issuing a slew of Rule 1:28 decisions, the Supreme Judicial Court granting Direct or Further Appellate Review to consider issues ranging from the proper procedure for appealing the allowance of an anti-SLAPP motion to whether the Duracraft Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Heidi A. Nadel
2016 was another big year in anti-SLAPP litigation – with the Appeals Court issuing a slew of Rule 1:28 decisions, the Supreme Judicial Court granting Direct or Further Appellate Review to consider issues ranging from the proper procedure for appealing the allowance of an anti-SLAPP motion to whether the Duracraft Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Heidi A. Nadel
2016 was another big year in anti-SLAPP litigation – with the Appeals Court issuing a slew of Rule 1:28 decisions, the Supreme Judicial Court granting Direct or Further Appellate Review to consider issues ranging from the proper procedure for appealing the allowance of an anti-SLAPP motion to whether theDuracraft Corp. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 9:48 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
 She contended the judge applied the wrong legal standard in his legal analysis, and specifically, the judge should have applied the “independent contractor statute,” G.L. c. 149 section 148B. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 9:19 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
In reaching its decision, the land court analyzed G.L. c. 236, § 12, the statute governing the effect of a levy of execution on property owned by either joint tenants or tenants in common. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:05 am by Daniel Cappetta
At trial, the Commonwealth filed a motion in limine, seeking to admit both the Cataldo and Whidden records under G.L. c.233, §§79 and 79G. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:05 am by Daniel Cappetta
At trial, the Commonwealth filed a motion in limine, seeking to admit both the Cataldo and Whidden records under G.L. c.233, §§79 and 79G. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 7:16 am by Stephen Neyman, P.C.
Larceny by False Pretenses Larceny over $250 by false pretenses is a felony in Massachusetts under G.L. c. 266 Section 34. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 7:16 am by Stephen Neyman, P.C.
Larceny by False Pretenses Larceny over $250 by false pretenses is a felony in Massachusetts under G.L. c. 266 Section 34. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 11:01 am by Daniel Cappetta
Under that framework, the defendant assert[ed] that, to provide constitutionally effective assistance, counsel must warn clients about consequences of sex offender registration when they are considering whether to plead guilty to a ‘sex offense’ as defined in G.L. c.6, §178C. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 11:01 am by Daniel Cappetta
Under that framework, the defendant assert[ed] that, to provide constitutionally effective assistance, counsel must warn clients about consequences of sex offender registration when they are considering whether to plead guilty to a ‘sex offense’ as defined in G.L. c.6, §178C. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:00 am by Michael DelSignore
Under G.L. c. 276A, § 10, the Court has jurisdiction to divert to a program any person who is: 1) a veteran, active service member or person with military history as defined in G.L. c. 4, § 7, cl. 43, charged with an offense for which a term of imprisonment may be imposed who has not been convicted of a violation of any law and who does not have any pending cases before any court. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:00 am by Michael DelSignore
Under G.L. c. 276A, § 10, the Court has jurisdiction to divert to a program any person who is: 1) a veteran, active service member or person with military history as defined in G.L. c. 4, § 7, cl. 43, charged with an offense for which a term of imprisonment may be imposed who has not been convicted of a violation of any law and who does not have any pending cases before any court. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 10:53 am by Daniel Cappetta
” The Commonwealth moved unsuccessfully for reconsideration and then sought relief pursuant to G.L. c.211, §3. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 10:53 am by Daniel Cappetta
” The Commonwealth moved unsuccessfully for reconsideration and then sought relief pursuant to G.L. c.211, §3. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 9:51 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
According to G.L. c. 152 section 25A(2)(b) and (c), the self-insurer secured a bond from XL Reinsurance, purchased reinsurance, and then denied a request for reimbursement by XL, according to the reinsurance agreement. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 12:08 pm by WynnAndWynn
Ultimately, the Court ruled that §15A is not part of the power of sale, G.L. c. 183, §21, or the applicable foreclosure statutes. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:24 am by Heidi A. Nadel
The case addresses the application and interpretation of the property tax exemption applied to religious houses of worship in G.L. c. 59, §5, Clause Eleventh, and raises First Amendment freedom of religion issues and potentially sweeping consequences for churches and other faith-based organizations. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:24 am by Heidi A. Nadel
The case addresses the application and interpretation of the property tax exemption applied to religious houses of worship in G.L. c. 59, §5, Clause Eleventh, and raises First Amendment freedom of religion issues and potentially sweeping consequences for churches and other faith-based organizations. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:24 am by Heidi A. Nadel
The case addresses the application and interpretation of the property tax exemption applied to religious houses of worship in G.L. c. 59, §5, Clause Eleventh, and raises First Amendment freedom of religion issues and potentially sweeping consequences for churches and other faith-based organizations. [read post]