Search for: "Grant Lambert" Results 141 - 160 of 454
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2018, 7:51 am by Amy Howe
[This post will be expanded later in the day to provide more details on, among other things, the cases that the justices granted today.] [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am by Aida Tohala (Bristows)
Claim 1 of the patent as granted was to the compound per se. [read post]
22 May 2015, 6:12 am by Jared Klaus
The guilty pleas were also historic in that they were entered by the banks’ parent companies rather than by subsidiaries — marking the first time since the Drexel Burnham Lambert scandal of the late 1980s that the primary banking unit of an American financial institution has pleaded guilty to criminal charges. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:32 am
Incidentally, the 81,423-wordjudgment does not contain the W word ...There has just fallen onto the desk of this Kat the judgment of Mr Justice Arnold at first instance following the full trial in the long-running case of Mylan and Actavis v Warner-Lambert. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 5:12 am by Peter Groves
My friend Jane Lambert has written about it on her NIPClaw blog so I don't feel the need to deal with it all - although I am preparing a recorded lecture. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 12:04 pm
Lambert, a habeas case in which the State of Arizona is seeking cert.; * No. 07-478, Hartmann v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Lord Justice Arnold found that Warner-Lambert continues to apply in the UK and applies to both second medical use and single compounds claims. [read post]
31 May 2015, 3:47 am
 The STRONG Patents Act - has several provisions including some relating to post grant proceedings carried out by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) requiring it to abandon the broadest reasonable interpretation standard (BRI) and mandating that claims be presumed valid. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
  But he also held that the balance of convenience favoured Actavis.Emboldened by this, Actavis sought to strike out the action, which Arnold J declined to do (Warner-Lambert II), except in relation to the claim for contributory infringement under Section 60(2) of the Patents Act, which he did strike out (Warner-Lambert III). [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 4:02 am by Mark Summerfield
  Allowing patents to be granted too easily therefore may therefore represent a significant social cost.A major component of the cost of bringing a drug to market is the need to conduct extensive clinical trials in order to prove the effectiveness and safety of the drug, and thus to obtain regulatory and marketing approval. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 6:11 pm by Howard Friedman
The state Court of Appeals granted emergency relief and dissolved the injunction, and then transferred the case to the state Supreme Court. [read post]