Search for: "Hewlett Packard Corp."
Results 141 - 160
of 304
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am
Jore Corp (Chicago IP Litigation Blog [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 10:54 am
Hewlett-Packard's board forced its former CEO to resign amid allegations of sexual harassment and expense-account abuses. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 1:02 pm
Settlements have been reached with Hewlett-Packard, SunTrust Banks, Edison International, and Jarden Corp., and proposals still are pending at Bank of America, P&GE, Allstate, Intel, and Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, according to the Laborers. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:36 am
IBM’s 2010 patent total nearly quadrupled Hewlett-Packard’s and exceeded the combined issuances of Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard, Oracle, EMC, and Google. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 12:14 pm
The following is a list of the top 30 companies on the list: Rank … [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 8:11 am
(AAPL) and Hewlett-Packard Co. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:10 am
According to the Order, Complainants Hewlett-Packard Company and Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:35 am
In 2010, U.S. companies obtained 50.3% of granted patents, compared with 49% in 2009.High-tech patents also dominated areas with the heaviest new patenting activity:Multiplex Communications (US class 370) -- 3.3% of totalSolid-State Devices and Transistors (US class 257) -- 3.1%Semiconductors (US class 438) -- 2.7%Drug Compositions (US class 514) -- 2.1% Data Processing and File Management (US class 707) -- 2%Computers and Processing Systems (US class 709) -- 2%… [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 5:25 am
Hewlett-Packard and Premier v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 5:25 am
Hewlett-Packard and Premier v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 8:34 am
Corp. of City of Industry, California; • Biostar Microtech International Corp. of Taiwan; • Cisco Systems, Inc., of San Jose, California; • Elitegroup Computer Systems of Taiwan; • EVGA Corporation of Brea, California; • Galaxy Micro Systems Ltd. of Hong Kong; • Garmin International of Olathe, Kansas; • G.B.T. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 3:37 am
BHP Billiton-Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan August (died in October) $38.6 Billion What a disappointment this one turned out to be. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 8:09 am
Oracle also got the non-monetary benefits of publicly tweaking its major rival (SAP), plus it was able to get a few digs into its frenemy Hewlett Packard over the testimony of AWOL former SAP exec Léo Apotheker. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:00 pm
Without additional guidance, the deliberate indifference standard may vitiate the requirement of “intent to infringe” under DSU Medical: this would revert us back to the now-rejected standard of Hewlett-Packard Co. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 8:00 pm
Without additional guidance, the deliberate indifference standard may vitiate the requirement of “intent to infringe” under DSU Medical: this would revert us back to the now-rejected standard of Hewlett-Packard Co. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 7:32 am
Hewlett-Packard Corp. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:06 pm
Corp. of City of Industry, California; Biostar Microtech International Corp., Hsin Tien, Taiwan; Cisco Systems, Inc. of San Jose, California; Elitegroup Computer Systems Co., Ltd. of Taipei, Taiwan; EVGA Corporation of Brea, California; Galaxy Microsystems Ltd. of Kowloon Bay, Hong Kong; Garmin International, Inc. of Olathe, Kansas; G.B.T. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Hewlett-Packard – ALJ Rogers grants motions to terminate investigation as to certain respondents in Certain Inkjet Ink Cartridges with Printheads (337-TA-723) (ITC Law Blog) (ITC 337 Update) Lockwood – Sham reexamination requests and Federal pre-emption: Lockwood v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm
The royalty amount assumes that the party would still be able to make a reasonable profit by selling the article in the open market.[5] Generally, the determination of a reasonable royalty for accused patent infringement applies the well-established factors set forth in Georgia Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
