Search for: "Icon Health & Fitness " Results 141 - 160 of 330
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2007, 7:49 am
  Here, court found the reference reasonably pertinent, and as a result affirmed the finding of obviousness.More detail of In re Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. after the jump. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 9:23 am by Dennis Crouch
Icon Health & Fitness (attorney fee awards in exceptional cases); and Medtronic v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 1:28 pm by LTA-Editor
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., Octane had been sued by ICON for infringing on ICON’s patent for adjustable elliptical machines. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 11:00 am by Lyle Denniston
Icon Health & Fitness — right of company accused of patent infringement to recover attorney’s fees if it defeats the claim Monday, March 3: 12-10882 — Hall v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 3:40 pm
Meanwhile, David Berry, writing for PatLit, discusses Octane Fitness LLC v ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., No. 12-1184 (U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:46 am by Ronald Mann
Icon Health and Fitness) considers the standard for awarding the fees in the first instance. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 2:13 pm by James L. Higgins
Supreme Court’s anticipated June 2014 decision in Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 8:16 am by Dennis Crouch
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. for imposing attorney fees under the similarly-worded 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 11:55 am by Martin Bader
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., Dkt. 12-1184, filed March 27, 2013, the question presented is whether “the Federal Circuit’s promulgation of a rigid and exclusive two-part test for determining whether a case is ‘exceptional’ under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:44 am by SHG
The timing of the mental health trend fits the smartphone’s increasing substitution for in-person socialization, while the Great Awokening and Trumpism are more chronologically downstream. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 12:23 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 572 U.S. 545 at n.7. (2014), a district court must consider the totality of the circumstances by simply weighing non-exclusive factors such as “frivolousness, motivation, objective unreasonableness (both in the factual and legal components of the case) and the need in particular circumstances to advance considerations of compensation and deterrence. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 8:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., No. 19-cv-2970, 2022 WL 486999 (ECT/DTS) (D. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 6:21 am
 Even though McCain —  The Icon of Civility — died that we might all come together.This is not normal. [read post]