Search for: "In re McArdle" Results 141 - 160 of 227
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2010, 11:37 am by Glenn Reynolds
Today, because social security payments exceeded revenue, we’re going to either have to raise taxes, or borrow more money, in order to cover the benefits. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 7:49 pm by Glenn Reynolds
MEGAN MCARDLE: Regardless of what you think about health care, tomorrow we wake up in a different political world. . . . [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 3:31 pm by Glenn Reynolds
MEGAN MCARDLE: Nick Kristof argues that once we pass health care, we’re going to see a big spike in life expectancy. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:32 pm
Judge Sontchi in in re Premier International Holdings disagreed sharply that Rule 2019 extends to ad hoc committees. [23] He then went on to explain that any amendments to Rule 2019 to increase the required disclosures would have no affect to those not already covered by the rule. [24]Judge Sontchi’s decision was in complete opposition to that of his counterpart, Judge Walwrath’s in in re Washington Mutual Inc. [25] Judge Walwrath used the currently proposed amendments… [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:36 pm by Mike
 Compare a blog posting by a decent writer like Megan McArdle with a magazine article in Esquire. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 7:00 am by Glenn Reynolds
MEGAN MCARDLE: “I hadn’t realized, when I wrote yesterday’s post, how many people are emotionally invested in first dollar coverage. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 1:36 am by Geoffrey Manne
  See Megan McArdle, John Scalzi, Joshua Gans, Virginia Postrel, Lynne Kiesling, Lynne Kielsing and Lynne Kiesling, among others. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 4:20 pm by Ilya Somin
If you think that’s censorship, you’re wrong. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 8:37 pm by Brian Hollar
Megan McArdle: …in the short term, the initial reports make it seem like we're going to have to impose some sort of order just to distribute aid. [read post]