Search for: "JANICE ROGERS BROWN"
Results 141 - 160
of 308
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2012, 9:05 am
"The implications of a Bivens action…is not something to be undertaken lightly," Chief Judge David Sentelle wrote in the court's opinion, joined by Judges Janice Rogers Brown and Thomas Griffith. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:28 am
While the court did not decide the Chevron question presented by AKM, one membe of the panel, Judge Janice Rogers Brown, made her position clear. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 12:42 pm
Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown in Hettinga v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 11:43 am
The court called a key part of the government’s argument “farfetched, almost absurd,” its cost estimates “obviously inflated,” and concluded that “plain language utterly destroys the Secretary’s claim that he can remain entirely passive and only act if some deus ex machina were to bring him information,” wrote Senior Judge Laurence Silberman for the unanimous panel, which also included Chief Judge David Sentelle and Judge Janice… [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:35 am
Circuit Judge Judith Rogers said in the ruling, joined by judges David Tatel and Janice Rogers Brown. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:01 pm
Circuit brought a scathing denunciation of the Supreme Court’s Boumediene decision by Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown, who said that the ruling was based upon “airy suppositions” and who suggested that the signal it had sent to the government in the “war on terrorism” was to “take no prisoners. [read post]
13 May 2012, 6:26 am
“…we [Judge Janice Rogers Brown and I] dress as Lillian Hellman and Yosemite Sam respectively. [read post]
11 May 2012, 12:29 pm
Judge Janice Rogers Brown, in a 3-0 opinion, sided with the government’s contention that acknowledging any records “might reveal whether the NSA investigated the threat,” or “deemed the threat a concern to the security of the U.S. government.” If we removed all the legalese, the appellate court upheld the government’s often-said contention that, “if we told you, we’d have to kill you.” Photo: DonkeyHotey/Flickr [read post]
11 May 2012, 11:31 am
The three-judge panel consisted of Senior Circuit Judge Douglas Ginsburg and Circuit Judges Brett Kavanaugh and Janice Rogers Brown—who wrote the opinion. [read post]
11 May 2012, 9:33 am
Writing for a unanimous three-judge panel, Judge Janice Rogers Brown rejected the argument that any partnership between Google and the NSA should be officially disclosed through a records request because the company and the agency's connection was earlier revealed in news articles. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 10:09 am
And Judge Tatel’s criticism of Judges Janice Rogers Brown and Karen LeCraft Henderson for having effectively replaced the district court’s fact-finding with their own—and all without having found any of the district court’s findings to be clearly erroneous—still seems to me, alas, valid. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:19 pm
Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown in Hettinga v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 7:22 am
Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown in Hettinga v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 11:12 am
Circuit panel today was Chief Judge David Sentelle and judges Karen LeCraft Henderson and Janice Rogers Brown. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 9:07 pm
Paul to buckle in housing-disparate-impact case [Kevin Funnell] Justice Janice Rogers Brown: we can dream, can't we? [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:24 pm
Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown issued a concurrence railing against post-New Deal progress and economic regulation that Media Matters’ David Lyle calls “a sweeping radical libertarian manifesto” and Jonathan Turley calls “less dicta than diatribe. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:38 am
Judge Janice Rogers Brown, writing for the Court, acknowledged that while federal courts typically defer to agency interpretations of enabling statutes, they do so when the statutory provision is ambiguous and the agency’s interpretation is reasonable. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:34 am
(Randy Barnett) I have been following the reaction to Judge Janice Rogers Brown and Chief Judge David Sentelle’s concurring opinion in Hettinga v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:12 pm
Circuit panel‹Judges Merrick Garland and Janice Rogers Brown, and Senior Judge Harry Edwards‹said the law was not so clearly established that the officers¹ no-knock warrant was unconstitutional. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 8:44 am
Writing for the three-judge panel, Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown agreed with the employer that the citations were indeed time-barred. [read post]
