Search for: "John W. Marshall" Results 141 - 160 of 542
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2019, 10:24 am by Derek T. Muller
$85,964 $76,299 $123,200 2299 Univ. of Washington-Seattle Campus $109,707 $108,071 n/a 2202 The John Marshall Law Sch [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am by Steve Lubet
Speaking of the first Monday in October, the revived New Rambler has just posted my review of the new biographies of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 2:06 pm
To the ends of this sort of project it has been necessary to identify a plausible foreign adversary, to find character evidence that suggests that this adversary has already engaged in such conduct elsewhere; and lastly to marshal evidence from which local interference might be surmised. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 8:38 am by Benjamin Wittes
Here are a few examples of such cases culled from recent Office of the Inspector General investigations: Findings of Misconduct by a United States Marshal for Making an Inappropriate Comment about Shooting a Judge and for Lack of Candor Findings of Misconduct by a DEA Assistant Special Agent in Charge for Failure to Act in a Professional Manner, and by a DEA Special Agent in Charge for Favoritism and Providing False Statements to the OIG Concerning the Allegations Involving the ASAC… [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 3:04 am
., Cleveland Marshall College of Law, Cleveland State University.Cataldo, Peter W.: Appointed to TTAB in 2006; Prior Professional Experience: Trademark Examining Attorney; TTAB Interlocutory Attorney; Education: B.A., Canisius College; J.D., Albany Law School.Coggins, Robert H.: Appointed to TTAB in 2017; Prior Professional Experience: Trademark Examining Attorney; TTAB Interlocutory Attorney; Education: B.S., Davidson College; J.D., Wake Forest University School of Law.Dunn,… [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:45 pm by Mark Walsh
But from the bench, Alito says, “[W]e have painstakingly researched the text of the Fifth Amendment” and other evidence. [read post]
29 May 2019, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
“In my judgment the judiciary may not … redetermine for itself the probable impact of disclosure on the national security,” wrote Justice John Marshall Harlan for himself and two other justices in the Pentagon Papers decision. [read post]